Liberal No More

Hillary Clinton Takes Shot at “Death of a President” Film

2006-09-22T07:37:00.000-07:00

By John W. Lillpop

In a surprisingly strong statement, Senator Hillary Clinton(D-NY) ripped the fictional film that stages an assassination of President Bush.

"I think it's despicable," Clinton said. "I think it's absolutely outrageous. That anyone would even attempt to profit on such a horrible scenario makes me sick."
Go here

Although it is not stated in the above story, Mrs. Clinton is known to prefer heavy ash trays to bullets when attacking an U.S. president.

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal

“Goodhearted, hardworking” Illegal Alien?

2006-09-21T02:18:00.000-07:00

By John W. Lillpop

Colorado authorities arrested a man Tuesday night on suspicion of murder after a woman was dragged to death behind a vehicle with a rope. The incident left a trail of blood more than a mile long. Go here

Jose Luis Rubi-Nava, 36, was arrested Tuesday night on suspicion of murder and jailed without bail. Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesman Carl Rusnok said agents believe Rubi-Nava is an illegal immigrant from Mexico.

It appears we have in our midst another one of those “goodhearted, hardworking” illegal aliens that President Bush, all Democrats and RINOS are so very fond of.

How many additional brutal murders will it take to convince President Bush that open borders and non-enforcement of immigration law are a major threat to Americans?

When will G.W. Bush and other elected officials fulfill their constitutional duty to defend Americans against all enemies, foreign and domestic?

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Why Illegal Aliens Must Be Licensed to Drive

2006-09-19T06:38:00.000-07:00

By John W. Lillpop

Liberal politicians in California have attempted on several occasions to grant driving privileges to illegal aliens, otherwise known as undocumented Democrats.

The leftist argument goes something like this: Illegal aliens are “good-hearted, hard-working” folk--even G.W. Bush says so--who are quite concerned about breaking California laws by driving without a license and insurance.

Think about it. California has about six million miscreants who have invaded America by crossing our borders illegally, and who have ignored all U.S. immigration laws.

These criminals access public services to which they are not entitled, evade both federal and state income taxes, and have overcrowded California prisons to the point where authorities are no longer able to effectively manage U.S. citizen inmates.

Illegal aliens have also forced hospitals and medical clinics into bankruptcy and out of business because those facilities are required to provide medical care regardless of ability to pay. Thus, facilities built for the care and treatment of U.S. citizens are no longer available to citizens.

Yet, liberals want thinking people to believe that illegal aliens simply want to do what is right in order to comply with the law?

Has human history ever recorded a more illogical, silly argument?

Actually, there is one argument that is nearly as foolish: Liberals who would grant driving privileges to illegal aliens are the same anarchists who vehemently oppose laws requiring positive identification at the voting polls.

In other words, if liberals had their way, illegal aliens would be licensed to drive to the polls, but would not be challenged before voting.

Of course, most, if not all, votes cast by illegal aliens would be for Democrats.

A right-wing cynic might speculate that opposition to positive voter ID is just another instance of Democrats eschewing the rule of law and democratic principles in order to gain partisan advantage.

OK, so call me a right-wing cynic.

To illegal aliens genuinely concerned about following the law, I have a perfectly logical suggestion: Head south, do not look back, do not come back, and do not write--even if you are able to!

Comprehende~?

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Just What in the Hell Is a “macaca”?

2006-09-18T15:49:00.000-07:00

It never ceases to amaze me how Democrats and Republicans fare so much differently in the media when it comes to ultra-sensitive issues like race.

Senator George Allen has provided the most recent firestorm with his use of the term “macaca” to describe a Democratic operative haunting Allen’s every move. Go here: http://card.wordpress.com/2006/08/16/sen-george-allens-racial-slur-macaca-makaka-macaque-or-mohawk/

Just one little problem with Allen’s “slur”: What in the hell does it mean?

Is it in reference to racial ethnicity? Perverted sexual orientation? A debilitating mental handicap like always voting for Democrats?

Although no one can pin down the exact meaning of “macaca,” the liberal media has enough information with which to proceed in it’s relentless crusade to run Republican Allen out of town, the United States, and the universe if at all possible.

What makes reaction to Allens’s apparent faux pas so perplexing is the fact that Democrat politicians have used far more abusive language and yet have survived nearly unscathed.

A classic example comes from California where Democrat Cruz Bustamante let loose with the Mother of all Slurs.

Bustamante was addressing a group of trade unionists in February 0f 2001, and while reciting a list of labor organizations that had the word "Negro" in their titles, Bustamante mistakenly blurted out the other “N” word—before an African-American audience!

Go here: http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2001/02/bustamante.html

Of course, African-American and Hispanic activists immediately came to Bustamante’s defense by pointing out that the rotund little weasel had an impeccable record on affirmative action and blah, blah, blah.

Bustamante survived and ran for governor as a part of the Gray Davis recall in 2004, and holds office to this day as California’s lieutenant governor.

But Cruz Bustamante is a liberal Democrat. So the rules concerning hate speech, racism, bigotry and divisiveness did not apply because he did not really mean it when he trashed 30 million black Americans.

But let a Republican like Arnold Schwarzenegger slip and refer to a Latina as “hot” and the California hate speech police go absolutely barking mad!

Yet there is no double standard. Right?

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Shortage of Virgins in Islamic Heaven?

2006-09-18T07:32:00.000-07:00

By John W. Lillpop

Adnan el-Shukrijumah, al-Qaida field commander in Afghanistan, is reportedly warning Muslims to leave the United States because another major terrorist attack is in the works. Go Here

As one who is fascinated by Islam, I admit to being confused by Adnan el-Shukrijumah’s warning. On the one hand, I appreciate the fact that the man is kind enough to warn brothers in the Islamofascist movement of impending doom so that steps can be taken to avoid annihilation.

On the other hand, one of the more appealing aspects of Islam is the promise of 72 virgins commencing with one’s earthly death and ascension into Islamic heaven. If that promise is true, why would Adnan el-Shukrijumah “warn” the brothers to leave?

It would seem to make better Muslim sense for Adnan el-Shukrijumah to keep that information under his turban. That way, Muslim brothers fortunate enough to be caught up in the next attack could cash in on those carnal blessings promised in the Koran.

Perhaps there is another answer: Is there a shortfall of virgins in Islamic heaven?

Could it be that G.W. Bush and his coalition of infidels have created a virgin supply-demand imbalance by killing so many terrorists? An imbalance that is threatening to shut down the Virgin Redemption Center (VRC) in Islamic heaven?

What a pity that would be. All those horny Islamofascists robbed of their greatest incentive to murder and maim.

If that is the case, Praise be to Allah!

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

America's New Manifest Destiny: Jihad or Mexico Light?

2006-09-18T01:18:00.000-07:00

By John W. Lillpop

As an English-speaking Caucasian, I have learned to accept the fact that America is in transition and is likely to become less and less Anglican.

The only remaining issue seems to be the race between Islamofascists and Mexican illegal aliens. Which group will take over America and change things even more and forever?

Or will illegal aliens and Jihadists form a coalition of the “good-hearted, hard-working” with the criminally insane? Perhaps they will convert the United States into a Muslim version of Mexico—a Latino cesspool and terrorist state?

Before those hot-blooded Latinos and short-fused Islamic extremists merge into one big dysfunctional family, several pressing issues will need to be resolved. The major issues are:

* Will Arabic or Spanish be the national language? Or will they create a new language called Spanibic?

* Will the official national headdress be the sombrero or exploding turban?

* Will Mexican women be forced to shield their faces in public?

* Will Mexican parents be required to raise their children to be suicide bombers. Will Mexican teens be shipped to Israeli pizza parlors on missions for Allah?

* Will Mexicans have to buy prayer blankets, face east, and pray to Allah five times a day? In Arabic?

* Will Muslims set up employment vigils outside Home Depot stores?

* Will adulterous Mexican women be punished by being stoned to death—rather than being stoned with Tequila and drugs as enticement for adultery?

* Will Muslims celebrate with piñatas at Christmas? Will their piñatas be stuffed with explosives?

* Will Mexican martyrs be rewarded with 72 virgins upon reaching heaven? Where will God and or Allah find 72 Mexican virgins?

* Will commercial phone instructions ask you to Press 1 for Arabic, 2 for Spanish, or 3 for Arabic and Spanish language lessons?

All of this pessimism can be summarized in one simple question: How do you say Reconquesta in Arabic?

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

"El Grito de Independencia” Message: Get the Hell OUT!

2006-09-15T07:27:00.000-07:00

By John W. Lillpop

September 16 is Mexican Independence Day. To the 20 million illegal aliens squatting tax-free in America, real Americans send the following “El Grito de Independencia” message:

We are FED UP with the invasion of our sovereign nation by third-world Mexican outlaws.

We are FED UP with people who are here illegally and who can not and/or will not speak English.

We are FED UP with illegal aliens from Mexico who cost American taxpayers scores of billions of dollars every year in health care, education, incarceration, and welfare.

We are FED UP with taxpayer dollars being wasted to print documents in a foreign language (Spanish).

We are FED UP with illegal aliens who dump their medical bills on the backs of U.S. taxpayers and who still send $20-40 billion a year back to Mexico each year.

We are FED UP with our schools being invaded by non-English speaking children from Mexico who impede the learning process of students who genuinely belong here.

We are FED UP with the fact that federal, state and local penal systems are overrun by illegals from Mexico, again costing taxpayers billions each year.

We are FED UP with the fact that the overwhelming majority of felony crimes being investigated in Los Angeles have been committed by illegal aliens from Mexico.

We are FED UP with federal, state and local agencies who refuse to round up and deport millions of illegal aliens who are destroying American culture and language.

We are FED UP with politicians who coddle illegal aliens with drivers licenses, lower college tuitons and similar benefits which only encourage more people to invade from Mexico.

We are FED UP with the attempted Mexicanization of America. Mexico is a third- world slum and we are FED UP with those who want America to be like Mexico!

Politicians--Democrat and Republican alike---who fail to heed the anger of the people concerning this issue will soon find themselves “former elected” officials.

Happy independence day---now get the hell out!

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Preserving American Security, Sovereignty, & Culture

2006-09-01T07:58:00.000-07:00

By John W. Lillpop

Herewith a simple set of ideas for saving America. This plan is reputed to be the work of a very famous Hollywood comedian but since that cannot be confirmed, he shall remain unnamed.

The Save America plan:

* U.S. will apologize to the world for interfering in affairs that were none of our business. That includes the likes of Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Hussein, and the rest of those "good old boys” whom we should have left alone.

* U.S. troops will be removed from all over the world, starting with Germany, South Korea, the Middle East, and the Philippines . They do not want us there.

* American troops to be reassigned to U.S. borders to protect America from invasion..

* Illegal aliens have 90 days to leave, with the U.S. paying their one-way fare out. After 90 days, those still here will be deported immediately, regardless of whom or where they are. They are illegal, but France will welcome them.

* All future visitors to the U.S. will be thoroughly checked and limited to 90 days unless given a special permit! No one from a terrorist nation will be allowed in. If you do not like your terrorist home, change it but do not hide here. Asylum will no longer be available to anyone. We do not need any more cab drivers or 7-11 cashiers.

* No foreign "students" over age 21. The older ones are the bombers. If they do not attend classes, they get a "D" and it's back home baby.

* The U.S. will make a strong effort to become energy self-sufficient. This will include developing nonpolluting sources of energy but will require a temporary drilling of oil in the Alaskan wilderness. The Caribou will have to cope for a while.

* U.S. will offer Saudi Arabia and other OPEC countries $10 a barrel for their oil. If they do not like it, we will go somewhere else. They can go somewhere else to sell their production.

* If there is a famine or other natural catastrophe in the world, we will not "interfere." They can pray to Allah or whomever, for seeds, rain, cement, or whatever they need. Most of U.S. aid is either stolen or given to the army. The people who need it most get very little, if anything.

* UN Headquarters will be shipped to an isolated island. We do not need the spies and fair weather friends on U.S. soil. Besides, the building would make a terrific detention center for illegal aliens awaiting deportation to Mexico,

* All Americans to attend charm and beauty school, courtesy of the U.S. government. No more "Ugly Americans" among us!

* ENGLISH is the language —and the ONLY language—Americans speak. Learn ENGLISH or get out!

A final note: The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses.”

Now she has a baseball bat and is yelling, “You want a piece of me?”

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Essential American Truths Hispanics Must be made to Understand

2006-08-28T04:43:00.000-07:00

By John W. Lillpop

After watching millions of illegal aliens protest in the streets of America in April and May, it is clear that many Hispanics, both illegal aliens and those here legally, are clueless about what it means to live in America and to be American.

Such people must be made to understand the following essential truths about America:

* America is a sovereign nation, completely independent of Mexico. It has been that way for more than 200 years, and we intend to keep it that way.

* In 1848, The Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo was ratified by both the United States and Mexican congresses. That Treaty satisfied any and all claims Mexico had to land now part of the United States.

* Native Indians were the original landowners of what is now the Southwestern United States. Any valid “chain of title” belongs to Native American Indians, not Mexicans.

* Brown may be beautiful in Latin America. But in the United States, we are partial to colors that symbolize freedom under the rule of law. That would be Red, White and Blue.

* In America, Mexico is a foreign nation and Spanish is a foreign language.

* Being hard working and good hearted is commendable, but those qualities do not entitle anyone to enter the United States illegally.

* Speaking two or more languages is fine-- provided one of the languages is English. Literacy in Spanish rather than English is not acceptable.

* Celebrating ones cultural heritage is perfectly fine--provided it does not interfere with assimilation into American culture.

* U.S. immigration laws exist to protect American citizens & others here legally, not to facilitate a foreigner’s pursuit of a better life, and

* Those who come to America must adjust to our culture and traditions. We have no obligation or desire to change our way of living to accommodate foreign newcomers.

Illegal aliens, please share this list with family and friends who may be thinking of coming to America illegally. Perhaps your experience will cause such people to stay in Mexico.

That would be a good thing!

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

English Vs. Spanish: A Question of Racism?

2006-08-27T07:22:00.000-07:00

By John W. Lillpop

In a rare show of wisdom several years ago, California voters passed Proposition 227 to abolish most forms of bilingual education. The premise was simple: When English is not spoken in the home, youngsters are at a decided disadvantage, and must, therefore, receive intensive English instruction elsewhere.

Coddling non-English speaking youngsters with bilingual instruction at school was correctly seen as counterproductive.

Unfortunately, some Hispanics educators refuse to abide by the law and continue to teach in Spanish. One such so-called educator was recently recognized as “Teacher of the Year” by a Southern California school district. Pancho, which is not his real name, proclaimed it his duty to instruct Hispanics in their native tongue, and hailed this defiance of state law as a major macho accomplishment.

Were it not for the fact that California’s educational system is so infested with liberals, Pancho would have been fired and his teaching credentials permanently revoked.

By refusing to expose his students to the language needed to succeed in America, Pancho should be arrested and charged with child endangerment/abuse.

As an educator, Pancho should know that California now requires students to pass a test in order to graduate from high School. One of the test subjects: English proficiency.

Do you get that, Pancho? English, not Spanish, is a requirement for high school graduation in California. The state does not test for Spanish proficiency because English is the predominate language in California and throughout America.

Pancho probably considers those who want English to be the official American language to be "racist." However, I am sure he does not see himself as being racist for preferring Spanish to English.

In fact, Pancho most likely believes that his defiance of state law is perfectly justified because bilingual education means diversity—and everyone knows diversity is enriching and good.

California parents, please remember this: English proficiency is required to graduate high school. Spanish proficiency is required to pick fruit and
operate leaf blowers. Which future do you want for your child?

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

“Do You Speak any Foreign Language?” “Only English!”

2006-08-23T17:28:00.000-07:00

Written by John W. Lillpop

Northern California is a wonderful place to live for a variety of reasons. Diversity and multi-cultural political correctness are not among the reasons.

For example, a simple chore like shopping for groceries can turn into a diversity nightmare for anyone with the arrogance to have been born in America and who speaks English—and only English.

Ask a store employee where kidney beans are, for instance, and the barely intelligible response will usher you off to the meat department. There I found swine kidneys, on sale at $3.44 a pound.

What a great buy, that is! Except I wanted kidney beans for a chili, and can barely stomach the idea of eating the kidney of a swine, or the kidney of any dead being for that matter.

Whizzing right along, one encounters shopper after shopper glued to cell phones, many shouting very loudly in Arabic or Spanish. The strangest, and most frightening, shoppers are those who shout alternatively in Arabic and Spanish.

Obviously, I look forward to checking out my groceries and returning home as quickly as possible.

But, alas, the checker is blathering on and on into her cell phone in Spanish, pausing every few seconds or so to scan an item or two. At each pause, the checker glares intently at us shoppers; she is obviously miffed that all these inconsiderate mall freaks are interrupting her important telephone conversation.

Things get a little better with the next shopper because he speaks Spanish, so he is in and out in short order.

Just before I reach the head of the line, a young man who speaks perfect English replaces the Spanish-speaking checker. “Victory,” says I. Score one for the Good Guys!

My victory celebration is short-lived, however, because the shopper right in front of me is an older man who speaks very broken English, that monster language created by the influx of aliens into California from Mexico.

So, the young checker with perfect English has the formidable task of trying to explain to a Mexican immigrant that one cannot use food stamps to purchase liquor. And as that comedic exchange takes place, the line of anxious shoppers grows and grows.

It all works out, finally, and as I relax in my favorite recliner, I praise God that I am safe at home where good English communication is still possible.

At that moment the phone rings and I smartly answer “Good evening. This is John Lillpop speaking.”

My heart sinks in despair at the response. “Que?” asks the caller.

“Do you speak any foreign languages?” she asks.

“Only English, my dear, only English!”

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal

Wanted: Warning Labels for Islamic Terrorists

2006-08-21T20:42:00.000-07:00

Written by John W. Lillpop

Warning! All Muslims are not terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims!

When the health hazards of tobacco became obvious in the decade of the 1950s, the U.S. government took action to alert Americans as to the hazards of smoking. It became mandatory to identify cigarette packages with ''warning labels'' so as to alert the consuming public that the cigarettes therein were potentially lethal.

Similarly, the American public has been bombarded with messages about fat, cholesterol, sugar, salt, meat products, automobiles, medicines, cancer-causing agents, too much sex, not enough sex, and on and on.

In short, Mother Government--aka Uncle Sam--has seen fit to stick her/his taxpayer funded nose into every nook and cranny of American life in search of potential danger.

Given the government’s obsession with identifying all agents of potential harm, why are the bureaucrats so reticent when it comes to clearly identifying the threat of terrorism? For instance, why does our government refuse to utilize racial profiling or other logical means for isolating those most likely to do harm to America?

In fact, if the government is concerned about the health and safety of the American people, the bureaucrats should undertake a massive campaign to educate the public as to the dangers posed by Islamic fascists. That message should state:

All Muslims are not terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims!

This message should be proclaimed on huge billboards in all airport lobbies, and on all roadways leading to air terminals. It should be taught in all public schools from kindergarten through high school. Each airline ticket should have the message embossed in large font on the ticket face.

Wake up, Ma Government and Uncle Sam. We need you to protect us against those who seek to wipe out thousands or millions of Americans in terrorist attacks.

Protect us from Osama bin Laden and those who have declared Jihad on America, and We the People will take care of ourselves when it comes to the risks involved in consuming chocolate and ice cream!

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal

Bill Clinton’s 60th Birthday

2006-08-18T21:50:00.000-07:00

Written by John W. Lillpop

Today, August 19, former President Bill Clinton will celebrate his 60th birthday. According to some written accounts, “celebrate” is not quite what Clinton has in mind. In fact, “Grin and bear it” would seem a more apt description of Clinton’s attitude to his advancing years and declining relevance in American society.

The dramatic aging of our 42nd president is so sudden that it is startling. Indeed, it seems like only yesterday that Slick Willie was turning the Oval Office into his personal harem and, unwittingly, a crime scene for the U.S. House Impeachment panel.

Perjury, subornation of jurors, and obstruction of justice charges followed Slick Willie throughout his stay at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. He had nearly as many lawyers as mistresses, and knew how to use both.

In those heady days, Clinton was often called a sex addict. Being a Sexagenarian seemed eons away for the man who appeared to have the sexual appetite of a seventeen-year-old and the morals of a stray, non-neutered alley cat.

But now, Clinton has snow-white hair, and more face wrinkles than adulterous affairs. Time has finally caught up with the man from Hope, Arkansas and it shows.

Love him or loathe him, no one can deny that William Jefferson Clinton was wildly entertaining. With Bill Clinton in office, there was never a dull moment. Or if there was one, you knew that it was only a matter of time until another “bimbo eruption” would rock Washington, D.C. and the world into yet another steamy scandal.

Happy 60th, Mr. Clinton!

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Statement by Abu Musab Zarqawi from Islamic Heaven

2006-08-18T14:20:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Brothers and Heirs to the Throne of Heaven,

Praise Be to Allah!

After my arrival here in June, I kissed the clouds and thanked Allah for deliverance from the infidel devils lead by that dyslexic Christian cowboy from Texas, G.W. Bush.

I prayed that, Allah willing, Bush would be forced to spend eternity with Nancy Pelosi in San Francisco, a situation otherwise known as hell.

Praise Be to Allah!

We know that Allah would never punish even the most awful infidel so brutally. So I faced west and, Allah forgive me, prayed to the infidel’s God.

God willing, Bush and Ms. Pelosi will be manacled together forever in San Francisco’s Castro District. Bush will suffer greatly, God willing, at the hands of tens of thousands of young men unable to marry because of Bush the homophobe infidel.

Praise Be to Allah!

Brothers, all is good in Islamic Heaven, save one detail.

Each of the 72 virgins that greeted me is the spitting image of Helen Thomas, a fiction writer who works in Washington D.C., Capitol City of the infidels.

Pray for me, brothers: These women are virgins, but not by choice.

This is not what I expected as my reward for being blown to smithereens.

Praise Be to Allah!

Allah willing, your prayers will deliver unto me 72 middle-eastern Muslim women, ages 15- 21, lean but not mean, beautiful and still virgins by choice.

Allah speed brothers! Without seductive virgins, this gig sucks!

Praise Be to Allah!

Your Comrade in Death,
Musab Zarqawi

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

This Terrorist Sympathizer Wears a Black Robe and Is Female!

2006-08-18T04:04:00.000-07:00

Authored by John W. Lillpop

In a shocking reminder of why Democrats must never be entrusted with power at any level, U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit ruled that a surveillance program utilized by the Bush administration in the war on terror is unconstitutional.

Who in the heck is Anna Diggs Taylor? And how in the name of all that is decent and righteous can an obscure federal judge unilaterally shut down a vital intelligence tool used by the U.S. commander in chief while the nation is at war?

What if a judge had ruled that the invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944, also known as D-Day, was unconstitutional? How would President Franklin D. Roosevelt have proceeded?

Or what if a liberal activist judge had imposed an injunction against America using the Atomic bomb in Japan in 1946? Would President Truman have simply complied?

Could America have won World War II with the likes of Anna Diggs Taylor advocating on behalf of the enemy?

As it turns out, Judge Taylor worked on Jimmy Carter’s presidential campaign in 1976 and was sworn in as a federal judge to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in 1979. Go Here

So, Anna Diggs Taylor was elevated beyond her capabilities during the administration of one of the worse presidents in U.S. history. Why does that fact not come as a great surprise?

Twenty six years after We the People booted the bumbling Jimmy Carter out of the Oval Office, his legacy of incompetence comes back to haunt America and all of the civilized world. Like a very bad penny, Jimmy Carter keeps coming back.

Despite her mind-numbing liberalism, surely Judge Taylor reads newspapers, watches television, browses the Internet, or listens to the radio. Right?

Judge, does September 11, 2001, ring a bill? What about the plot uncovered in the United Kingdom last week in which terrorists were in the final stages of “unimaginable mass murder?” A plot, by the way, which was discovered and dismantled in cooperation with U.S. intelligence authorities?

If Judge Taylor’s ruling ultimately stands, then it is point, match, and championship for the terrorists. Osama bin Laden, with an assist from the Lady in Black from Detroit, will have trumped G.W. Bush, the American people, and the cherished principles upon which this great nation was founded 230 years ago.

And history will note, probably in Arabic, that Islamic fascism prevailed in the war on terror because of an abuse of judicial power by a female terrorist sympathizer in a black robe, sans only the burka.

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

An Inconvenient Fact: Liberals to Blame for U.S. Dependence on Foreign Oil

2006-08-17T21:10:00.000-07:00

Authored by John W. Lillpop

America’s inability to free itself from dependence on oil from the Middle East may go down as one of the greatest failures in U.S. political history. Even the most generous historian will find it difficult to justify our continued reliance on a region of the world that has been in constant turmoil for more than 50 years.

Given the political instability in the Middle East and the skyrocketing costs of oil, U.S. leaders should be working around the clock to make America truly energy independent.

Unfortunately, the Democrat Party is adamantly opposed to any measures that would increase the supply of this precious commodity.

Why is that the case?

Because environmental elitists like Al Gore have decided that average Americans should not drive automobiles. In Gore’s warped vision, the unwashed masses can damn well walk, skateboard, bike, hike, or preferably, not navigate at all. Except when headed to the polls to vote for Democrats, of course.

Mind you, “Limousine Liberals” like Gore, the Clintons, John Kerry, et al. will always have their SUVs, stretch limousines, private jets, and the like. It’s elitist, liberal arrogance gone mad!

In advancing their no-combustion engine agenda, liberals obviously exacerbate the energy crisis by toiling 24/7 to do the following:

* Obstruct all oil drilling

* Obstruct added refinery capacity via extreme environmental regulations

* Obstruct nuclear energy and other reasonable alternative energy sources

* Tax “windfall profits,” and implement other anti-business steps that stifle efforts to increase oil supply

What about the demand side? Liberals are just as mindless there, by opting to add federal and state taxes to the cost of gasoline at every opportunity.

Clearly, “gas pains” are the product of liberalism run amok. So, the question voters will have to answer this November is:

Are you ready to wait in long lines just to pay $5 for a gallon of gasoline? If so, vote for ‘’obstruct and tax’’ Democrats!

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Would “Kinder, Gentler” President Have Prevented 9/11?

2006-08-17T08:22:00.000-07:00

Authored by John W. Lillpop

As the fifth anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attack approaches, Americans interested in preserving our way of life should pause and reflect on the following facts:

* President Bill Clinton refused to take Osama bin Laden into custody on at least two occasions. Had Clinton spent less time with Monica Lewinski and more time defending America, 9/11 might not have happened.

* Jamie Gorelick, the No. 2 person in the Clinton Justice Department, was chief architect of the “Wall” which prohibited communications between U.S. intelligence and law-enforcement agencies. Had Ms. Gorelick pursued career opportunities--like day laborer or day care--more suitable to her skill sets, the Twin Towers might still be standing.

* John F. Kerry, Democrat presidential hopeful in 2004, actually proposed a “kinder, gentler” war against the murderous thugs responsible for 9/11. Honestly, when looking at photos(Go) of the Twin Towers in flames, does “kinder, gentler” even enter your mind as an option?

* G.W. Bush, for all his warts and wrong-headed policies on illegal aliens, spending, and the like, has kept the terrorists from an encore of 9/11 on American soil. For that, Bush deserves our everlasting gratitude.

With mid-term elections less than three months away, Americans need to be reminded that Democrats generally believe that evil does not exist, except in U.S. policy and administration.

That liberal mindset almost guarantees another 9/11 if Democrats regain control of the government.

We must not allow that to happen. So, please, vote early, vote often and vote GOP!

John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Pelosi's "Lily-White, Republican Only" Membership Breached!

2006-08-16T14:19:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Pity poor Nancy Pelosi. Her Culture of Corruption campaign strategy for retaking the US House seemed to be going so well.

But then a funny thing happened to the bug-eyed airhead from San Francisco:

Democrats assaulted Capitol Hill police, drove under the influence of pills and/or alcohol, and were allegedly involved in bribery.

The latest stray Democrat involves Rep. William Jefferson, implicated in a bribery scheme as a result of two separate guilty pleas.

Jefferson joins Cynthia McKinney and Patrick Kennedy on Pelosi's "Do Not Send Xmas Card" list for 2006.

Between them, McKinney, Kennedy and Jefferson have ripped to shreds the "Lily-white, Republican Only' exclusivity Pelosi was so desperately counting on.

Diversity is not a good thing when it comes to Pelosi's 'Culture of Corruption," or so it would appear.

Other fallout: Pelosi's has been forced to destroy a huge inventory of campaign buttons reading “No More Culture of Corruption'”

Now that is a good thing!

Why America Needs President Hillary Clinton in 2008

2006-08-15T22:16:00.000-07:00

Authored By JOHN W LILLPOP

With the possible exception of blaspheming the Holy Ghost, the most egregious sin a conservative can commit is to knowingly express anything positive about the junior senator from New York, Ms. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Or to be more precise and less politically correct, Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.

However, egregious sin is actually my favorite summer pastime. So herewith, is an endorsement of the unlovable Lady Clinton.

Mind you, I descend into Satan’s domain with eyes wide open, knowing that my license to practice hate-mongering in the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy may be irreversibly revoked. El Rushbo, Michael Savage, and Sean Hannity will no longer accept my collect calls. But, alas, the pilgrim's path in never easy.

Let's face it, troops. George W. Bush is not Ronald Reagan, or nor even George H. Bush for that matter.

A man claiming to be conservative has duped us. He is a president who has presided over an unprecedented expansion of government and federal spending. Who has cavorted with the devil--AKA Teddy Kennedy--in No Child Left Behind; who speaks Spanish, but seems completely incapable of coherent English. Who is unable to spell veto--in English or Spanish!

How can it possibly get worse?

In fact, assuming Republicans retain control of Congress, President Hillary Clinton could be a dramatic improvement.

You say what, Mr. Lillwhatever Pop?

For starters, conservatives would be emancipated from supporting a Republican-President-in-Name-Only (RPINO) who clearly regards fiscal responsibility and other basic conservative solutions as old hat, and not in vogue.

Secondly, those wonderful conservative instincts that have served America so very well in the past would return to the GOP with a flourish if there were a President Hillary Clinton to battle with.

Please consider the following: How would a Republican Congress deal with a new entitlement program costing ten trillion dollars, if proposed by President Hillary Clinton?

Would a GOP Congress allow the national debt to grow wildly out of control, to the detriment of untold numbers of future generations, if a liberal Democrat was president? What if Madam President refused to secure our borders in time of war, and had the gall to propose amnesty for 20 million illegal aliens? Or what if she remained silent while the Mexican military escorted drug smugglers across the border into America?

What if President Hillary Clinton proposed to sell management of U.S. port security to an Arab nation with known links to terrorists?

Such situations emanating from a Hillary Clinton administration would rally Republicans to take immediate action, concerning themselves only with doing that which is in the best interests of the American people.

For those who may have lost sight of a simple truth, doing what is best for America means sticking to conservative values.

There would be other advantages as well: President Hillary Clinton and Slick Willy might bring back some of that taxpayer-owned china and other booty pinched from the White House in late January, 2001. Said booty would once again be on property owned by We the People, until at least 2012 or 2016. That would be a good thing.

And with Slick Willie free to run wild in the Oval Office and adjoining back room again, there would surely be three or four sex scandals a year to investigate, providing unlimited blogging material for those of us who blog to the right of center.

Slick might even use all that sophisticated domestic spying apparatus at the White House to eavesdrop on lonely bimbos in Arkansas or Pakistan. He might even persuade Lady Clinton to do likewise, creating a perfect impeachable scenario for Republicans to adjudicate.

That would mean even more great blogging material for us right-wing nutcases.

All of which is why, as of this moment, I am convinced that a vote for Hillary is the most patriotic thing one can do in 2008!

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Dealing with corruption--the Liberal Way!

2006-08-15T21:25:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

As scandal after scandal rocks the liberals, we decided to canvass some big time Democrats to see how they are holding up.

Herewith a summary of dealing with corruption--the Liberal Way!

Corruption? What corruption? I know nothing about it---that's Nancy Pelosi's gig!

I have one thing to say---Howard Dean is supposed to take care of corruption! I am too busy redoing the Speaker's office to worry about such trivia----unless we can nail a Republican!

Corruption? Jeez, man, my babysitter---oops, I mean office manager, handles all that for me! John Conyers

War on Terror More Lengthy than World War II? Blame Liberalism!

2006-08-14T22:07:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

A reader in the San Francisco Bay area recently had a letter published in the San Jose Mercury News in which he cited some interesting facts about the length of the war on terror as compared to World War 11.

Unfortunately, the reader–obviously a biased liberal, made no attempt to explain why World War II was decided in so much less time.

The fact is that during World War II, both political parties were solidly behind the American troops and the U.S. president. Both parties wanted the United States to win.

There was no John Murtha, Nancy Pelsoi, John Kerry, or Howard Dean doing their best to cripple U.S. war efforts. The U.S. Supreme Court was not working against American interests. Mike Wallace had just barely reached retirement age.

Back then, there was no ACLU working 24/7 to destroy the U.S. military. The New York Times was not leaking highly sensitive information about government surveillance programs.

Most reporters and editors in the mainstream media were American patriots first and reporters trying to sell war news stories second.

The bottom Line is that if the liberalism of 2006 had been around during World War II, America would still be fighting Japan, Germany and Italy.

Or, even worse, living under a Nazi and/or fascist regime.

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, 'clean and sober' since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, the only place on the planet where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Barry Bonds' Era Officially Ends

2006-08-14T07:49:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

When Los Angeles Dodgers’ catcher Russell Martin hit a game-winning homer off Giants’ pitcher Vinnie Chulk on August 13, he did far more than conclude a three-game sweep by the hated first-place Dodgers.

Martin’s blast signaled a new era of domination by Los Angeles youth over San Francisco age. From now and into the foreseeable future, Dodger Stadium, not ATT Park, shall be the venue for league championship series, pennants and the World Series.

The steroid-plagued era of Barry Bonds has officially ended.

It was a nice run while it lasted. What a pity it never produced a world championship.

But that is a San Francisco baseball tradition, is it not?

Pity, too, that the Bonds will be forced to sit on his asterisk, sans that coveted World Series ring.

Have We No Compassion? What About The Haitians?

2006-08-13T18:53:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

As millions of illegal aliens marched in cities all across America last spring and summer DEMANDING citizenship and full rights after ignoring US borders and immigration laws, one wondered: What next?

How about the good people of Haiti? There is hardly a more oppressed, impoverished people in the world. Haitians have other advantages:

They are uneducated, illiterate, people of color. Perfect future Democrats, in other words.

They do not speak English. Another ideal match, if you are stuck with a warped, liberal mind.

Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Haitians set sail for the American Dream each year in leaky old wooden pallets, unsuitable for use as kindling wood, much less navigating the sea.

Risking life and limb, these courageous people come only in pursuit of a better life. Unlike Mexicans coming to reconquer the American Southwest, Haitians come only for freedom and--work.

Unfortunately for Haitians, they are usually intercepted at sea before reaching the US mainland, and turned back. Those who somehow make it in are immediately jailed, and prepared for deportation.

But to be perfectly fair, why shouldn't Haitians be allowed to assemble in major American cities and demand, demand, demand?

There are only 8.5 million of them. Surely we have room for a few hundred million more?

But, you say, Haitians would have to cross the sea, not a land border.

Right.

So, here is my plan.

Haitians, start your life pallets and head for--Mexico!

Once there, you can simply stroll across the US border and start demanding rights, food, education, health care--in short, the American Dream.

After all, as good-hearted, hard-working peasants you deserve American citizenship. Don't believe me? Ask any American liberal!

Caution to Haitians: Do NOT get caught as an illegal alien in Mexico. Folks there will regard you as a felon, and you can expect very harsh treatment from the same fools who think America should turn our beautiful nation over to 20,000,000 Mexican peasants.

One other tip: Once you arrive in Mexico, follow the taco and Cuervo beer lines to Los Angeles. Once a proud, majestic city, LA is now the Illegal Alien Capitol of the World.

The man in charge there, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, loves illegal aliens. He already babysits for about 10 million in Los Angeles, so I am sure he can find room for some needy Haitians.

Mayor Villaraigosa will arrange for all your needs, including voting ballots, housing, driver's licenses, education, food, health care--the whole ball of wax.

Worried about language barriers? Fret not! Mayor Villaraigosa will require all public service providers to speak and write Haitian!

Antonio is a "giving" kind of guy, especially when it comes to taxpayers money. So enjoy.

He is not very bright-- he is what we call a Democrat---but, hell, when you are on the down and out, you take what you can get, right? (Nice guy, but do not let your sister marry one of his kind.)

Welcome to America!

Open Letter from Jesus to Hillary Rodham Clinton

2006-08-13T18:30:00.000-07:00

Authored By JOHN W LILLPOP

At the risking of appearing blasphemous, I present herewith my vision of what an Open Letter from Jesus to Hillary would say were He were inclined to write:

Dear Hillary,

How are you and Slick Willy---excuse me, President Clinton---managing these days?

Its great knowing you have worked so hard to preserve your marriage. Hillary, you deserve a congressional medal for all you have tolerated over the years..… especially the stuff on Pages 602 through 709 of Ken Starr’s 1998 Impeachment Report to congress.

Sleazy!

My primary reason for writing is to congratulate you for advocating humane treatment of the 20 million illegal aliens who have invaded the US. You are to be applauded for sticking to hardball politics while everyone around you has obscured the issue with irrelevant talk about secure borders, homeland security, and the rule of law.

Enlisting my name in opposing HB 4437 was a shrewd political move on your part and one that will surely earn you favor with illegals who will vote in large numbers if Howard Dean’s recruiting drive works.

While I am thrilled that you are concerned about the welfare (pun not intended) of 20 million illegal aliens, I would ask that you re-prioritize your efforts to more fully embrace my Good News ministry.

Specifically:

-As I have repeatedly stated, you will always have the poor in your midst. Republicans and big business will see to that, so do not be overly concerned about the plight of the less fortunate.

-In lieu of your exaggerated hysteria about illegal aliens, I request that you devote your energies and resources to the callous murder of the unborn.

According to government statistics, 40 million precious lives have been brutally snuffed out since the Roe V. Wade Death Sentence on the Unborn was issued in 1973. 40 million innocent lives destroyed because angry white females loved the honey, but could not take the bees!

Please work to overcome this national sin, Hillary. By deporting 20 million illegals, you can make room for the unborn that will be saved by overturning Roe V. Wade. We call that a win-win!

-Because you are now an expert of the Holy Scriptures, I am sure you realize that homosexuality is a grievous sin, against both God and nature. It is called an abomination in the Good Book, and I ask that you work for a constitutional amendment to recognize marriage as it was in the Garden of Eden: One man and one woman. Not two men, or two women, or two men and a horse, or any other perverse concoction that liberals might dream up just for more votes.

To recap: Illegals out, babies in, gays out, man-woman marriages in.

Really quite simple, isn’t it?

One last piece of advice: I tried to slow Bill down a little with that quadruple by-pass last summer. But he seems to be getting spunkier by the day----watch him like a hawk, Hillary, especially during your upcoming campaign!

Best Wishes,

JC

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Source of Bush Decline Revealed!

2006-08-13T17:51:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Washington D.C.(Lillpill News)--

Sources close to God, speaking on condition of anonymity, have told Pat Roberston and Jerry Falwell the exact root-cause of GW Bush's disastorous decline.

Seems as though God is really pissed off at the shame and disgrace brought to America and the White House by a perverted, fat hillbilly who was president..without securing a majority of the popular vote, by the way.

That would be Slick Willy--known in some liberal wacko circles as Bill Clinton.

According to Pat and Jerry, God has just got around to placing a pox on the White House, in retribution for Clinton's immorality and perjury.

Bill Clinton---the pervert that keeps on perverting!

Now, for the latest in Democrat party news, we turn to Igor Fiberal in our Moscow office..

Liberal Activist Judge Fails as Execution Expert

2006-08-13T17:37:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

In 1981, Michael Morales set his sights on 17-year old Terri Winchell and marked the young California woman for death. And what did Ms. Winchell do to provoke Morales?

She had the audacity to date a man involved in a homosexual affair with Ricky Ortega, a male cousin of Morales. To untangle this perverted love triangle, Morales decided to eliminate the female involved.

Morales began his mission by attempting to strangle Winchell with a belt. Failing that, he pulverized Winchell's skull with a claw hammer. It took 23 hacks, but Morales was finally able to subdue his prey.

End of story? Sadly not, because Morales was not finished. He decided the freshly slaughtered young woman could satisfy his carnal urges; so, he! raped the dead Winchell to seal the deal.

Morales was found guilty and sentenced to death. His date with destiny was scheduled for 12:01 AM, February 21, 2006. Unfortunately, a liberal activist judge, by the name of Jeremy Fogel, decided that Morales should not suffer any "excruciating pain" during execution.

Judge Jeremy Fogel actively pushes the liberal agenda from his lofty position on the bench at a US District Court in San Jose. But His Honor stepped over the line by dictating the procedures to be followed by California in ending the life of the sub-human killer, rapist and torturer.

Fogel was instantly transformed from US District Judge to execution expert, at the expense of justice.

As a result of His Honor's intervention, Morales is still alive, at least for a while.
And the killer who used a claw hammer to destroy a beautiful human lif! e is temporarily spared the pain of being jabbed with a needle, the sort of pain one endures in getting a flu shot.

And that is justice? Apparently so, at least according to one of the killer's attorneys who wrote "Yee-haw!'' in an e-mail announcing the stay.

But at least California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has it right. "The federal court has interjected itself into the details of the state's execution process,'' Schwarzenegger said in a statement. "I am confident that the convictions and sentence were appropriate in this case. I will continue to fight to uphold California's laws."

We are with you all the way, Guv. May the next scheduled gig for The Terminator end with real justice, rather than undeserved victory for the killer!

Cindy Sheehan in the Hands of Providence

2006-08-13T13:21:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Providence hospital, that is.

The anti-war demonstrator took on the 100-degree Texas heat and got her head handed to her. Sheehan was hospitalized Friday for dehydration and exhaustion after fasting for more than a month.

Sheehan was listed in stable condition at Providence Health Center in Waco. Go here

Obviously, that refers only to her physical condition, as Sheehan is clearly unstable emotionally and mentally.

She is, in other words, a typical liberal.

Still, it could have been worse for the woman who is honoring her son's death by discrediting and ridiculing the cause for which he gave his life.

Things would be much grimmer had Sheehan had been afflicted with diarrhea-- there might have not been enough of her remains left for a decent funeral!

No Statue of Limitations on Murder--Lets Prosecute All Baby Killers!

2006-08-13T12:12:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

As everyone knows, there is no statute of limitations on murder. Murderers are subject to prosecution and punishment until their own sorry lives are finally ended.

Given the fact that baby genocide in the United States has claimed at least 40 million babies since the Roe V. Wade abomination, the federal government has a moral, legal and social obligation to seek full justice for the exterminated.

Instead of concerning itself with NSA wiretapping and other legitimate measures taken by G.W. Bush to protect the American people from terrorism, the U.S. congress should hold hearings to determine why the Department of Justice has failed to identify, arrest, prosecute, and punish all parents(male and female), physicians and other medical personnel party to the mass annihilation of millions of innocent children.

Get with the program, Department of Justice! Arrest a couple thousand mums, dads, and docs for murder and watch the fireworks begin.

Of course there will be appeals--the murderers will claim the protection of Roe V. Wade.

But you can counter that with an appeal all the way to the newly-constituted U.S. Supreme Court--the one that now includes brothers Roberts and Alito.

The key strategergy is to get an "Abortion is Murder" case before the court as soon as possible. Then let "Compassionate Conservatism" take over in court.

Its in your capable hands, Attorney General Gonzales.

Millions of yet-to-be-conceived fetus folk are counting on you!

Kofi Annan--Peacemaker or Terrorist Enabler?

2006-08-13T10:38:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

In a statement released Saturday, Kofi Annan said: "I am happy to announce that the two leaders have agreed that the cessation of hostilities and the end of the fighting will enter into force on 14 August." Go here

Thus, Annan appears to have solved one of the most vexing conflicts in human history, dating back thousands of years.

Indeed, ending the fighting through a forced ceasefire was relatively easy--something one could trust to even a lightweight, so-called diplomatlike Madeline Albright for example.

But to negotiate a "cessation of hostilities" between Jews and Muslims implies far greater miracle working. Its almost as if Annan was able to confer a "spiritual awakening" on both sides, the result of which will be mutual respect, kindness and acceptance between the parties forever more.

If so, one wonders why Annan did not implement an immediate--as in now, not Monday--love-in between Israel and Hezbelloah?

Such a plan could have saved lives and property that will be lost during the extra war days until August 14.

In addition, the Reuters new agency could have laid off its entire Middle East photo fraud staff early, in anticipation of an urgent need stateside when that monster Category 5 hurricane slams into New Orleans, Florida or even New York City in the weeks ahead.

Reuters will surely need a full contingent of deceit photo "journalists" to convince the public that G.W. Bush's snub of the Kyoto Treaty has caused massive global warming and Category 5 storms. Obviously, those storms have been designed by Bush and the neocons to punish poor people of color for--well, being poor and people of color.

Reuters apparently believes it has a civic responsibility to make that argument with whatever indelicate staged photos may be necessary.

But back to the man of the hour, good old "Food for Oil" Kofi.

Lets drop the cynicism long enough for a well-deserved tip of the hat to Annan for restoring "insanity light" to the Middle East.

With a little luck, Israel will not be wiped off the map by Iran before Annan's ceasefire takes effect!

Breaking News: California Court Issues Common-Sense Ruling!

2006-08-12T06:47:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

In a breathtaking departure from a long-standing judicial tradition, the California Court of Appeal panel in San Francisco issued a common -sense ruling on Friday.
Go Here

Repeating: Anonymous sources are claiming that a common-sense ruling has been issued by a California court.

Sources also claim that National Guard troops are quietly being redeployed from California airports to the court in San Francisco, but Governor Schwarzenegger has not yet commented officially on that aspect of this momentous story.

At issue is California's requirement that students pass an exit exam that measures math and English skills in order to graduate.

About 40,000 students, or 9.1 percent of the 2006 senior class, failed at least one section. Students can take the test an infinite number of times, but must pass both sections in order to graduate.

Attorney Arturo Gonzalez, representing some of the students who challenged the exam requirement, said the latest ruling will be appealed to the state Supreme Court.

Earlier this spring, Gonzalez alleged "discrimination," against minority and low-income students who were unable to pass the exam.

The San Francisco attorney apparently does not understand that the express purpose of exams is to determine if students have mastered subject matter well enough to be granted a certificate of achievement---in this case, a high school diploma.

To the extent that the exam "discriminates" against students who fail the exam, Gonzalez has a point.

But is that not the express purpose of exams to begin with?

For example, in order for Gonzalez to practice law, he was required to first pass the bar exam. On the other hand, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa was unable to pass the bar, and has been forced into politics for which there are no intellectual, educational,ethical, or moral requirements.

In Gonzalez' convoluted logic,Antonio Villaraigosa is a victim of dircrimination. Fact is, the Los Angeles Mayor is just not bright enough to earn an honest living by practicing law.

In the same vein, the California high-school exam does not measure race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, credit score, personality, level of poverty, parental English usage or liberal wackiness.

The questions concern math and English. Period! End of story, next case please.

Gonzalez also fails to recognize the "discrimination" students will face in the real work world without basic math and English skills.

Indeed, students need to be aware that when looking for work in Silicon Valley and other high-technology venues, there will be no nutcase liberal attorney waiting in the wings to argue on behalf of unqualified job applicants.

In other words, Intel is looking for people who can design chips, not eat them.

Gonzalez nearly succeeded in keeping California schools ‘dumbed down’ to the point where graduation could be conferred upon any student able to prove four years of successful breathing.

Or, produce a note of explanation from a welfare case manager or parole officer.

Now, students represented by Gonzalez’ will be forced to recognize words and phrases like "Failed," "Not part of graduating class," and "Wait ‘till next year."

And those words shall be in English, mind you!

But all is not gloom and doom. In fact, there is actually some good news for Arturo’s Aces: None will have to worry about actually being able to read a High School diploma--for at least another year.

For his part, Gonzalez remains unbowed. Rumor has it his appeal to the state Supreme Court will based on the fact that most of those who failed were answering a much higher calling: Marching in the streets and freeways of Los Angeles to demand citizenship and rights for illegal aliens.

Gonzalez allegedly plans to argue that HR 4437 is a racist, bigoted bill that drove his clients from study halls to protest marches in pursuit of basic human and civil rights. Civics 101 of the liberal nut ball variety, if you will.

And everyone knows that making Mexican flags and banners reading si se puede is far more important than studying for a silly math or English exam.

When asked to explain why Asian ‘minority’ students, even those with limited English skills, fared so well on exit exams, Gonzalez allegedly explained that it was yet another example of discrimination: Very few Asian students are illegal aliens, he contends, and almost none marched in April or on May 1.

There you go. Irresponsible Asians with their little yellow noses to the grindstones, while civic-minded Latino kids unselfishly took to the streets and freeways for the larger community good.

Alas, is there no justice?

Questions Our Politicans Must Answer in the Immigration Debate

2006-08-11T23:49:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

In 1986, President Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control (IRAC) Act, the stated purpose of which was to end illegal immigration by imposing severe penalties on employers who hire people without a legal basis for being here.

IRCA also granted amnesty to approximately four million illegals here at the time, most of whom hailed from Mexico. Again, the thinking was that by granting a one-time amnesty, illegal immigration would no longer be a problem.

Unfortunately, IRAC has never been enforced. In fact, it has been blatantly ignored by both Democrat and Republican administrations.

As a consequence, 20 years after enactment of IRAC, America has been invaded by as many as 20 million additional illegal aliens--on top of the four million granted amnesty in 1986.

In terms of sheer numbers, if the population of illegal aliens currently here was a separate state, that state would be the most populous in the United States, excepting California.

Because illegal aliens represent so many serious threats to American citizens, it is essential that lawmakers consider several vital questions when debating illegal immigration:

*Can America afford to grant amnesty to third-world peasants equal in population to the entire nation of Australia? Or five times the population of Ireland? Sixty seven percent the population of Canada?

*Does it make any sense to add what would essentially be a 51st state comprised of majority third-world criminals who are impoverished, uneducated and non-English speaking?

*Why should the United States even consider amnesty for those who believe that Mexico is still the rightful owner of the U.S. Southwest, and that “gringos” should be forced to leave the continent?

*Can America tolerate a subculture in which the Mexican flag is more esteemed that the Red, White, and Blue, or in which Spanish is the preferred language over English?

*Why should American citizens who have paid taxes all their lives be subjected to the displacement and turmoil that comes with radical changes in racial demographics, language and culture?

*If amnesty was in fact enacted now, how long would it be before another 20 million illegal aliens would ignore our borders and laws in pursuit of a better life?

Islamically Speaking, Never Misunderstimate a Terrorist's Strategery

2006-08-11T08:37:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

President Bush has apparently decided (finally) that there are notable exceptions to the notion that Islam is a "Religion of Peace."

Like when Muslim "evil doers" are caught in the middle of a campaign to blow up a dozen or so planes. G.W. correctly described that plot as part of a "war with Islamic fascists."

As expected, Muslim leaders were none too thrilled with the new G.W. articulation skills: "We believe this is an ill-advised term and we believe that it is counter-productive to associate Islam or Muslims with fascism," said Nihad Awad, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations advocacy group.

Source:
But perhaps Awad has a point. Rather than associating Islam or Muslims with "fascism," lets really tell it like it is:

"The civilized world is at war with Islam, a collection of violent religious fanatics--aka terrorists-- devoted to converting every living organism on the planet to their religion. Islamic terrorists are unbound by values common to civilized people. They do not respect human life, and will use mayhem and murder against any and all who reject Allah and the Koran."

Wishful thinking on my part, that G.W. would actually make such a statement?

Probably, but given the reaction of Mr. Awad, it seems the president is finally moving away from PC and toward brutal truth.

And that is a good thing, strategerically speaking.

Terror Alert: Middle-Eastern Males Need not Apply!

2006-08-10T10:59:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Scotland Yard has disrupted a terrorist plot to commit "mass murder on an unimaginable scale" by blowing up planes in flight from the United Kingdom to the United States. Go here

This news has prompted the U.S. Government to raise the nation’s threat level to Severe, or Red, for commercial flights originating in the United Kingdom bound for the United States.

As expected, avowed enemies of America, including CAIR, the ACLU, the Democrat National Committee, and the liberal news media are more concerned about offending Middle-Eastern males than about preventing a dozen or so planes from being blown up.

The urgent message from the left is: Do not overreact by using racial profiling or other stereotyping tools that might offend young devotees of the Religion of Peace.

Translated: Abandon all common sense in favor of PC, especially in an election year!

So, assume the following travelers are waiting to be screened at your airport. As the honcho responsible for the safety of hundreds of thousands of passengers each day, which group would you pay special attention to?

( ) Thirty-five nuns in habits and full religious dress en route to "catch a peek at the Pope" in the Vatican?

( ) Players and coaches of the Kansas City Royals baseball team--known to be a very serious terrorist threat by long-suffering Royals fans?

( ) A group of handcuffed illegal alien felons waiting to be flown back to Mexico as part of a long-overdue deportation?

( ) Seventeen young men of Middle-Eastern origin, speaking Arabic, holding one-way tickets paid with credit cards, and wearing T-shirts labeled "Win One for Allah!" ?

( ) A group of Caucasian seniors, all women, from Pat Robertson's 700 Club en route to Damascus with a revised Road Map for peace in the Middle-East?

( ) A group of blind jugglers on their way to a Braille convention in Seymour, Washington?

Its not easy being tough on terrorism-- when the enemy is PC at all costs!

Democrats Set to Commit "Hairy-Kerry" Again?

2006-08-10T03:04:00.000-07:00

By abandoning Joe Lieberman for supporting the war on terror, Democrats have decided that Kool Aid will be the party drink of choice this November.

Poison provided courtesy of Howard Dean and the DNC.

Even now, mass graves are being excavated, using only union labor of course, in anticipation of November election results.

Just a few months ago, public opinion polls showed Democrats gaining voter confidence in their ability to handle national defense and terrorism. Imagine that--voters actually trusting Democrats over Republicans when it comes to keeping America safe.

For the first time since well before George McGovern made Richard Nixon's reelection a lead-pipe cinch and Watergate the most unnecessary crime wave in American political history, Democrat was synonymous with defense, rather than defeatist

But, with success comes responsibility and Democrats have never been particularly diligent about anything.

With the exception, that is, of raising taxes and kicking God out of all public venues where two or more "sensitive" Muslims with jihad on their minds might congregate

Thus, Lieberman's loss is a clear signal to the DNC elite: Defeatism is back!

In other words, the party of abortions, assisted suicides, and murders' rights
has decided that "Hairy-Kerry" is preferrable to winning. Perhaps its more inclusive?

Yet again, Democrats are set to make G.W. Bush look like a political genius and clever strategerist--a feat the man could never accomplish on his own.

Pelosi Culture of Corruption to Lie In State at Rotunda

2006-08-09T09:49:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

God spoke to Moses Through a Burning Bush: Let's Thank Our God by Burning GW Bush!

Nancy Pelosi(Dunce-CA), anointed to be the next Speaker of the US House by the MSM, today announced final arrangements for the internment and burial of her Culture of Corruption(COC).

Pelosi's COC was declared officially dead after several primary results failed to produce expected gains for Democrats. Cause of death was determined to be exposure to the light of day, a condition often fatal to liberal arguments, candidates and rhetoric.

Pelosi also announced that the following Democrats were directly involved in the murder of the Pelosi COC: William J. Jefferson Cynthia McKinney Patrick Kennedy John Conyers, and Harry Reid.

Francine Busby is listed as a co-conspirator because of her idiotic statement that encouraged illegal immigrants to vote, Pelosi added.

The expired COC will lie in state at the Capitol Rotunda for a brief time. Normal protocol for state funerals will apply, except that Capitol Police, FBI Agents, Traffic Police, and Ticket Takers will not be assigned to the service.

This departure from tradition is seen as a gesture of goodwill by Pelosi in deference to McKinney, Jefferson, Kennedy and Reid and their respective issues with the aforementioned authority figures.

Pall bearers will be the first six clean and sober illegal immigrants that can be found on Capitol grounds. Only those with no papers and who speak only Spanish will be eligible to serve.

This, it is rumored, is in deference to Francine Busby.

Funeral services will include rich and diverse music and spiritual themes including:

* McKinney will sing a solo version of "I shot the Sheriff."

* Conyers, Jefferson and McKinney will team up as a trio for a lively rendition of "We shall Overcome."

* Patrick Kennedy will hum the "The Days of Wine and Roses" as long as someone agrees to drive him home.

Pelosi will deliver the main eulogy titled: "God Spoke to Moses Through a Burning Bush: Let's Repay God by Burning GW Bush!"

In lieu of flowers, Pelosi requests that unmarked bills be mailed to DNC Headquarters: Attention Bush Extermination Fund. Not tax deductible.

Georgia Voters Reject Anti-war Racist

2006-08-09T06:46:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

In a stunning victory for president G.W. Bush and the forces of common sense, cop-beater Cynthia McKinney was expelled from the U.S. House of representatives by Georgia voters on Tuesday.

Georgia voters thus did a bit of "Housekeeping" in Nancy Pelosi's Culture of Corruption. Housekeeping that the bug-eyed airhead from San Francisco should have done on her own.

McKinney, known for her conspiracy theories about the Sept. 11 attacks, was demolished by Attorney Hank Johnson, a former county commissioner, who won the nomination with 59 percent of the vote, surpassing McKinney by more than 11,000 votes. Source:

The defeat of this racist dunce is proof positive that anti-war Democrats are about to commit hairy-Kerry on a grand scale in November--again!

But why try to stop them? After all, ending ones life, political and otherwise, is a personal choice best left to the individual. Right?

Besides, anti-war nutcases like McKinney and Cindy Sheehan are the best thing the Republicans have going this election!

"He Passed Peacefully--Surrounded by Loving Family"

2006-08-09T06:31:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

As we age, our priorities change. For instance, my daily routine now consists of the following: First thing in the morning, check obituaries in the local paper. If I ain’t listed among the dearly departed, we have a go--for at least one more day.

Unable to shake my obsession with efficiency, I always read the obituaries before taking any meds or plugging in the coffee pot. I have always been a stickler for not wasting time or energy.

Of course, scanning the obituaries can be very depressing--except when you come across the name of someone to whom you owed money. In that case, you praise the Lord for bringing that brother home!

An obituary phrase that always leaves me puzzled is the boiler plate that reads: “He passed peacefully into the arms of the Lord, surrounded by loving members of his family.”

Every time I read that line, my mind projects to my own death bed and what my final thoughts might be concerning those "loving" family members surrounding me:

-There’s my younger brother, Paul. Damn he’s getting fat---he should be the one croaking ,not me. But he has always been someone’s favorite--looks like he’s even conned the Grim Reaper!

-And there is Ex # 1. Wonder what the hell she wants--she is not in the will. Wish I could see her old prune -face when she hears that cheery news.

-My sister Martha is here with her laptop. Damn attorney probably plans to download my will and start fighting over my pennies once the nurse gives the high sign. Bitch!

-Ex # 2--sobered up long enough to drive me mad one more time, huh? Well, since you will end up in the Hot Place, this is the last time I have to look at your ugly face! (That woman is so homely even Catholic Charities turned her away)

And finally, there is my current significant other, Millie. Wonder where she spent the night and with whom? She is also out of the will for being a two-timing, gold digging lady of ill repute.

How do I know you ask? That’s how I met her, brother!

Oops! I feel a sharp pain in my chest. Nurse, hurry! Can you raise my right hand and extend my middle finger to those vultures rooting for my last breath?

One last obscene gesture and it’s adios to Millie and all the rest of my “loving" family!

"Doctored" War Photos Provide Aid and Comfort to Enemy

2006-08-08T07:32:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Thanks to eagle eyed bloggers wary of main-stream media war coverage, the Reuters news service has been forced to concede that some of the photographs used in its coverage of the Middle East war were tampered with.

In a released statement, the wire agency announced the withdrawal of all 920 photographs by freelance Lebanese photographer, Adnan Hajj from its database. Source

Aside from the fact that a major news outlet fell victim to a hideous propaganda campaign, the real tragedy is that media has become so liberalized that such an outrageous fraud would even make it past the editor's cut.

After all, this is war-- and war is hell! Regrettably, innocent people, including women, children and the elderly, are killed during war.

Does anyone believe, for example, that all 100,000 Japanese killed in the bombing of Hiroshima were military combatants? And that that carnage included no children or women or elderly?

Another more recent example: Does anyone remember September 11, 2001? Of the 3,000 dead from that attack how many were civilians? More succinctly, were there any military casualties?

Avoiding civilian casualties is nearly impossible because Islamic jihadists deliberately place war-making weapons and men in the midst of civilian neighborhoods and mosques. They do so knowing that fanatics like Adnan Hajj, aided and abetted by the liberal U.S. media, will publish any and everything to make the United States and Israel appear evil.

What a pity that America's enemy in the war on terror includes news professionals-- reporters, photographers and editors-- who would rather advance anti-American propaganda than report the facts objectively.

jwl copyright

Illegal Aliens Die in Crash--Racism to Blame?

2006-08-07T20:55:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Nine illegal aliens were killed in a highway crash Monday while trying to elude Border Patrol agents, and at least 12 others were injured, officials said.

The large sport utility vehicle carrying up to 22 people swerved to avoid a spike strip put out by Border Patrol agents, Sheriff's Maj. Leon Wilmot said. Source

I fully expect that liberals, including Hispanic activists from La Reza, will decry the accident as a racist assault against people of color, and demand that immediate steps such as the following be taken:

( ) Immediately repeal Prop. 200, Arizona's anti-illegal alien bill

( ) Arrest the perusing border patrol agents for involuntary manslaughter

( ) Require all speed limit signs to be posted in Spanish

( ) Locate survivors and immediately register them as Democrats for 2006 election

( ) Register all 22, including the expired, as Democrats.

( ) Blame the accident on global warming, and sue the Bush Administration for $500 billion dollars in punitive damages.

Arizona's liberal Governor Napolitono will probably respond with something brilliant like "These are all great ideas, but $500 billion does have a nice right to it."

Fret Not, Cuba. G.W. Bush is no John Kennedy!

2006-08-07T15:16:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

From AP comes word that leftist intellectuals and human rights activists around the globe are uging the United States to "stand down" with regard to Cuba while Fidel Castro recovers from his medical problem.

In response, President Bush said "The only thing I know is what has been speculated, and this is that, on the one hand, he is very ill and, on the other hand, he is going to be coming out of hospital."

"Our desire is for the Cuban people to choose their own form of government" said the president. Source

Sounds as though G.W. Bush has those international "intellectuals" worried that America might have designs on Cuba now that Castro is incapacitated.

Were you expecting an invasion, intellectuals?

Rest easy, commie pinkos. If you are concerned about a Bay of Pigs redux under G.W. Bush, forget it.

G.W. Bush may not be the sharpest knive in the drawer, but he is no John Kennedy!

A Prayer for Deliverance from Liberal Insanity

2006-08-07T04:02:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Oh, God of my Father. Deliver me, Lord, from the ravages of liberal insanity.

Heal me so that I might see the inherent evil in the liberal agenda including:

*Removal of God from schools and public discourse

*Anti-Christian barbarism

* Abortion rights

* Feminism

* Homosexuality

* Illegal immigration

* Loose moral standards

* Anti-American activism

* Welfare dependency

* Assisted suicide

* Desecration of U.S. flag

* Disregard for U.S. Constitution

* Judicial activism

* Higher taxes

* More government

* School busing

* Affirmative action

* The United Nations,ACLU,labor unions, tax withholding

Prayerfully submitted in the name Of Jesus.

Amen.

Use Yankee Ingenuity to Fix Mexico's Election Mess

2006-08-06T14:14:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

It should come as no great surprise that a nation which can not feed, house, educate and provide minimal health care for its citizens can not manage free and fair elections.

And so it is with Mexico. More than a month after the July 2 presidential election there, tens of thousands of angry protesters are threatening to seize Mexico City's airport and otherwise engage in civil disobedience.

The seeds of discontent were sown Saturday when Mexico's Federal Electoral Tribunal decided that Lopez Obrador failed to provide sufficient evidence of irregularities or fraud to warrant a full recount.

However, losing candidate Obrador is unwilling to concede. "We are going to continue our peaceful civil resistance movement," Lopez Obrador said Saturday, adding that the tribunal's judges were "legally weak."Source

It sounds as though losing leftists in Mexico are being coached by the same thugs who attempted to steal the U.S. election for Al Gore and the Democrats in 2000.

Still, there may be a way for the United States to help Mexico climb out of its election hole, while at the same time addressing a vexing issue facing Americans.

I refer to Lopez Obrador's urgent need for left-leaning Mexican voters and America's oversupply of the same, in the form of illegal aliens.

By forcing a large percentage of the 20 million illegal squatters now here illegally to return to their beloved Mexico, the United States could help bring justice to Mexico--at least until the next election.

By spreading Democracy in this manner, America could avoid a repeat of last April and May when millions of illegal aliens took to the streets of Los Angeles, Dallas, Chicago and other U.S. major cities to demand citizenship.

How perfectly logical that those same criminals should be sent home to march in Mexico City and other slum cities in that third-world cesspool.

So, let the deportations begin and prepare to celebrate the mother of all win-win deals!

Exposing Liberal Bias in the Media

2006-08-05T23:19:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

The woman being comforted has just (Select the best answer):

* Learned that her teenage son is in love with "A very nice Jewish boy in the Israeli army."

* Filled the family SUV with Unleaded Regular and is trying to find the money to pay the gas station attendant

* Opened the July bill for running the AC in her New York City flat

* Been told that Condi Rice is humanity's best hope for stopping the Israeli-Hezbelloh war

* Learned that her daughter tests in the same achievement percentile as GW Bush in public speech, vocabulary, and reading comprehension.

* Seen Al Gore's fiction movie "An Inconvenient Truth" and is planning her future and that of her children accordingly

* Discovered that she has won the Mega Lotto worth U.S. $50 million dollars. But in order to claim the jackpot, she must convert to Judaism, and turn in all undetonated suicide back packs stored at the local mosque.

Unfortunately, photographs like this are used extensively by the liberal media to slant public opinion against America, Israel, President Bush, Republicans and all things good and decent.

Shame on the low-life liberal media!

Hispanically Speaking, Never Misunderestimate Your Foe's Strategery

2006-08-04T20:58:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

To say that Washington politicians speak in stealth, and without apparent transparency, would itself be a perfect example of code-speak.

Fact is, most of what is said for public consumption in Washington has at least one possible alternative meaning. "Plausible Deniability" is an especially annoying ploy to shield public servants from overexposure should the light of day threaten to wreak havoc on previous assertions.

So it was with that cynical perspective that I read President Bush's recent statement to the Cuban people concerning their future, sans Fidel Castro.

Bush said "We will support you in your effort to build a transitional government in Cuba committed to democracy, and we will take note of those in the current Cuban regime who obstruct your desire for a free Cuba." Source

To the politically naive, that would seem a fairly innocuous statement of reassurance to a nation of people that has suffered under a Communist dictator for more 40 years. G.W. was simply reminding Cubans that America stands ready to help should Castro expire any time soon, right?

However, to those of us who know better, G.W. was really firing a warning shot at Fidel's radical brother, Raul Castro. In my view, G.W. was speaking in code about Cuba's future and his own political aspirations--inextricably linked if my political analysis is accurate.

In effect, G.W. was saying, "Fidel Castro is in God's hands. And that means the old commie fart will soon be your 'dearly departed' former president.

But fret not, Cuba, because as luck would have it, yours truly will soon be looking for an executive position. I can bring you freedom, democratic rule and trade with the United States."

In other words, G. W. was announcing his intention to run for president again--but next time, he will be seeking the top job in Cuba.

And why shouldn't he?

In January of 2009, G.W. Bush will be just 62 years old--a veritable lad. He takes no prescription medications and appears in excellent physical health. A perfect candidate to lead Cuba out of the dark days of communist despair and into the bright future of Compassionate Conservatism.

Running for president of Cuba certainly beats the hell out of alternatives recently offered by Don Rumsfield. Rummy suggested that Bush do one of the following:

* Declare himself eligible for another term based on the perverted liberal argument that Al Gore actually won the 2000 election, or

* Append the 2007 Defense Appropriations bill with a Signing Statement declaring the 22nd amendment to the U.S. Constitution null and void.

Both ideas lack political pizzazz and are unlikely to connect with voters, even with all those bombs, tanks, fighter jets, guns, and Marines at Rummy's disposal.

Besides, G.W.'s strengths and experience might benefit Cuba.

A resume of qualifications for GW might read as follows:

G.W. Bush
The Oval Office
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington D.C.

Career Objective:
Executive position with government-backed pension and retirement benefits, plus two months annual vacation.

Related Experience:
Worked for eight years to bring peace, prosperity, and harmony to America. Would have succeeded were it not for partisan, leftist thugs known in the United States as Democrats.

Language Skills:
Spanish
Mexican
Texan--Pidgin English with a drawl

Greatest Achievement As President:
Trained Barney to stop doing his business on the Oval Office carpet.

Greatest Obstacle As President:
Learning the correct pronunciation of nuclear-- is still what they call a work in progress.

Favorite Song: Hail to the Chief.

Currently Reading: August Readers' Digest

Just Finished Reading: June Readers'
Digest*

* Stuck in Washington most of July-- unable to get to Crawford library to check out
July Digest.

Fondest Memory As President:
Telling John Kerry he had the wrong number when he called to concede the election in 2004

Foreign Leader Most Admired:
Yo! Blair

Foreign Leader Least Admired:
Flat-footed tie between Osama bin Laden and Ted Kennedy

Hobbies:
Autographing my demolished cycling helmets and selling them to pay for faster cycling bikes.

Role Model:
Cross between Yogi Berra and Ken Lay.

Advise for Next U.S. President:
Hispanically speaking, never misunderestimate your opponent's strategery

References:
See results from 2004 U.S. presidential election

Availability:
January 2009 at the latest. Depending on the 2006 mid-term elections, it could be much sooner.

And finally, the G.W. Bush Vision Statement for all Cubans:

Good eyesight is vital to seeing a bright future. I encourage all Cubans to take good care of the eyes God gave you, even if you do not always see eyeball- to -eyeball with him.

Run George, run!

Can America Afford 20 Million More Criminals from the Third World?

2006-08-03T23:10:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

In 1986, President Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and
Control(IRAC) Act (Reform and Control Act (IRAC) the stated purpose of which was to end illegal immigration by imposing severe penalties on employers who hire people without a legal basis for being here.

IRCA also granted amnesty to approximately four million illegals here at the time, most of whom hailed from Mexico. Again, the thinking was that by granting a one-time amnesty, illegal immigration would no longer be a problem.

Unfortunately, IRAC has never been enforced. In fact, it has been blatantly ignored by both Democrat and Republican administrations. As a consequence, 20 years after enactment of IRAC, America has been invaded by as many as 20 million additional illegal aliens--on top of the four million granted amnesty in 1986.

In terms of sheer numbers, if the population of illegal aliens currently here was a separate state, that state would be the most populous in the United States, excepting California. Source

On a global scale, that "Illegal Alien State" would rank among the most populous in the world based on current data:

Canada: 33 million
Iraq: 27 million
North. Korea: 23 million
Australia: 20 million
Ireland: 4 million

Source:

Because illegal aliens represent so many serious threats to American citizens, it is essential that lawmakers consider several vital questions when debating illegal immigration:

* Can America afford to grant amnesty to third-world peasants equal in population to the entire nation of Australia? Or five times the population of Ireland? Sixty seven percent the population of Canada?

* Does it make any sense to add what would essentially be a 51st state comprised of majority third-world criminals who are impoverished, uneducated, and non-English speaking?

* Why should the United States even consider amnesty for those who believe that Mexico is still the rightful owner of the U.S. Southwest, and that "gringos" should be forced to leave the continent?

* Can America tolerate a subculture in which the Mexican flag is more esteemed
than the Red, White, and Blue, or in which Spanish is the preferred language over English?

* Why should American citizens who have paid taxes all their lives be subjected to the displacement and turmoil that comes with radical changes in racial demographics, language and culture?

* If amnesty was in fact enacted now, how long would it be before another 20 million illegal aliens would ignore our borders and laws in pursuit of a better life?

We the People must make known our complete opposition to any hair-brained scheme that would reward millions of outlaws here illegally with the most prized possession on the planet: U.S. citizenship.

Losing this battle is not an option, because to do so will cost we Americans our beloved nation itself.

"Axes for Allah" Parade at Theme Park Canceled

2006-08-03T09:06:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

The largest theme park in Britain, Alton Towers, had scheduled a ”Muslim fun day,” but it’s been canceled due to lack of interest, according to the park.

Darn, this is terrible news! I was so looking forward to the "Axes for Allah" parade at the end of the evening.

"Axes for Allah" is a take-off on the parade that closes each day at Disney.

But whereas the Disney parade is a joyful occasion staged for children, the Islamic version is designed to whet the appetites of adult jihadists--with the rich blood of infidels.

The festivities begin with the random selection of five infidels by park stewards. The infidels are then decapitated by Islamic jihadists with axes certified as "Infidel Ready" in a local Mosque.

The object is to see which jihadist can severe the head of his assigned infidel the quickest.

Severe means the infidel head must be in the bucket, fair and square. Instant replays and appeals are not allowed.

Camcorders for recording the axtion are available for rent to Muslim school teachers and religious clerics responsible for educating Muslim youth. Audio recording equipment is also available, but is extra.

The ax-murdering winner is crowned "Axhole of the Day," and leads the grand parade in a float adorned with the bloody axes of all jihadist winners for the past week.

Seasonal discount coupons are available--to infidels only.

Those Muslims do not miss a trick when it comes to profiteering!

G.W. Bush-- Why Does He Refuse to Listen to We the People?

2006-08-02T18:58:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W. LILLPOP

In the White House press room, President Bush mockingly cups his ear as if struggling to hear questions posed by the media.

Now over 60, the president apparently needs all the help he can get hearing the voice of We the People.

Although critics alledge that the problem is not organic, but is rather one of reluctance to listen.

In other words, the president's hearing is fine. But his willingness to listen to,and abide by, the will of the people has gone wonky.

On illegal immigration, for instance, President Bush continues to push "Comprehensive Reform," widely recognized as amnesty for illegal aliens.

With as many as 20 million illegal aliens currently in the United States, a majority of Americans want President Bush to immediately secure the U.S.-Mexican border to stop further invasions from Mexico.

Americans are also opposed to the so-called Guest Worker program proposed by the President, and do not believe that illegal aliens should be rewarded with citizenship.

Recent polling numbers indicate that the president is also out of touch with voters on the war in Iraq and federal spending.

Most Americans now believe that the nation is headed in the wrong direction.

With all due respect, you had better listen, sir.

Otherwise you may be forced to listen to a Bill of Impeachment filed against you by a hostile Democrat congress next winter.

Liberal Insanity and Taxes

2006-08-02T13:16:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

To any liberal worth his or her weight in Impeach Bush! bumper stickers, nothing is more dangerous than a tax cut involving the return of money to those who actually paid taxes.

Mind you, leftists see nothing morally or economically wrong with passing out tax refunds to illegal immigrants, the homeless, incarcerated felons or anyone who has paid no taxes to begin with.

Unless, of course, a non-payer happens to be a Republican who earned "obscene" profits, and who, for whatever reason, did not pay all taxes owed.

In these rare instances, most liberals will vacate their opposition to the death penalty and will push for swift execution.

After all, dead Republicans with high-value tax liens can help bail out inept Democrat office holders and their inevitable budget woes.

Given the liberal mindset on taxes, it should come as no great surprise that recent good news on tax revenues was greeted with outright skepticism by the Left.

The good news was this: As a result of the Bush tax cuts, federal tax revenues have actually increased , thereby reducing the deficit more quickly than planned.

All Americans--liberal and conservative--would surely cheer such good news, right?

Well, not exactly.

Liberals and the mean-spirited media not only did not cheer the news, but absolutely refused to congratulate President Bush for a policy that stoked the engine of free enterprise and added jobs to the US economy.

Other than political jealously, why would liberals be anything but joyful at increased government revenues?

According to a liberal friend, the answer is simple:

Additional revenues could have been realized by simply increasing, rather than reducing, taxes on corporations and the wealthy.

And, liberals contend, that would have saved scores of millions of dollars spent to process and deliver tax refund checks. To say nothing of the interest lost to the government whilst tax refunds were in the unwashed hands of the public.

To the liberal, there is no greater sin than to relinquish control over monies that have already been extracted from the tax-paying public. Even if to do so would ultimately result in greater revenues for the federal government.

That is insanity!

Woe be Unto Those Who Offend 'Little Ones'

2006-08-01T08:53:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Israel's air attack on Qana on July 30 resulted in the death of 37 children.

The Israeli government claims that the death of innocent children was a "tragic mistake." Hezbelloh has been accused on using civilians, including children, as human shields.

Regardless of the underlying facts, 37 precious children are dead. Victims of non-ending war in the Middle East.

Media images of those dead and mutilated children are haunting reminders of the horror of war and the carnage visited upon the most innocent and vulnerable among us.

Seeing dead and suffering children also brings to mind the stern warning issued by Jesus in Matthew 18: 6:

'But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.'

Jesus made no allowances for 'Collateral Damage' or 'Tragic Mistakes,' all too common during a bloody war.

The millstone would appear to apply to all who harm His 'Little Ones.'

However, although Jesus made no mention of intent, one can safely assume that the darkest, most punishing, corners of hell are reserved for those who deliberately use innocent children to wage war by using their young bodies as weapons of mass destruction.

Indeed, deliberately forcing a child to strap explosives to his or her body as a suicide bomber just to kill civilians, including other innocent children, is beyond comprehension.

Such barbaric behavior must surely be far more grievous than being party to an act of war in which children are mistakenly, and unintentionally, harmed.

Nearly 2000 years after Jesus, Israeli Prime Minister Golda Mier remarked that peace will be realized in the Middle East at such time as Muslim Arabs love their children more than they hate the Israelis.

Unfortunately, that day has not yet arrived.

Man's inhumanity toward man continues unabated, including unspeakable offenses against the world's 'Little Ones.'

Woe be unto those!

Testing Ones "Liberal Quotient" On Illegal Immigration

2006-07-31T09:04:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

As the debate on illegal immigration heats, this quiz has been designed to measure ones “liberal quotient"---the opposite of intelligence quotient--- on this vital issue:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Illegal immigration is:

( )Desperately needed by liberals in order to win elections

( )A misnomer...they are actually undocumented democrats!

( )Mexico’s chief export

( )NOT a threat to US homeland security. Why would Mexican peasants destroy
the land of free rice and tacos?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Border security should be:

( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce

( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce AND More Democrats

( )Turned over to Vicente Fox in the name of Diversity

( ) Used to keep Republicans out of the US

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The proposed fence between the US and Mexico is:

( ) A terrific idea, if built by firms owned by women and minorities

( ) Unconstitutional..discriminates against Mexicans too fat to climb over a fence

( ) “Pork” in Red States, but economic necessity in blue states

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The proposed Guest Worker Program:

( )Is illegal if it prevents Mexicans from collecting welfare

( )Will work if guest workers are required to join a labor union

( )Should include free health care, drivers licenses, college degrees
and interest-free mortgages for illegal aliens

( )Sounds like amnesty, but Mexicans here illegally DESERVE amnesty!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spanish Vs. English. Mexican illegal immigrants should:

( )Be required to continue with Spanish as their only language because
DNC has printed 30 million ballots in Spanish for the 2008 election

( )Be kept English-illiterate to avoid exposure to GOP lies and propaganda

( )Be taught vital English words and phrases like welfare, food stamps, ACLU,
racism, class-action lawsuit, Vote Democrat!, six- pack of Cuervo ASAP

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Janet Napolitano, Democrat Governor of Arizona:

( )Was FOR Illegal Immigration Before She Was AGAINST it

( )Was a “stealth” candidate in Mexico’s presidential election in early July

( )Eloped with Democrat Governor Bill Richardson, with whom she has had three abortions

( )Thinks ‘Minutemen’ is a reference to the sexual staying power of Border Patrol agents

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In dealing with massive protests by illegal aliens, the most prudent action would be to:

( )Send a Letter of Unconditional Surrender to Vicenete Fox along with a fully-executed Quit Claim deed to California, Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico.

( )Pardon all 20 million illegal aliens with an Executive Order signed
by President Bush & approved by Vicente Fox

( )Hand out Spanish-language ballots for 2008 with Hillary Clinton’s name
pre- punched as a vote for president

( )Sell forged driver’s licenses and Social Security cards, and use
proceeds to buy ads opposing HR 4437

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, how did you do? Liberal enough to be considered anti-American?

That is the goal of the DNC you know.

Greater Threat To America: Vicente Fox or Osama bin Laden?

2006-07-30T22:08:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

When Mexico’s Vicente Fox visited the US in May, his purpose was to rally Mexicans squatting illegally in America. Common criminals the Mexican president foolishly calls ‘heroes.’

Odd, that.

According to the logic-challenged Fox, Mexicans living in America illegally are heroes, whereas illegals living in Mexico from nations south of Mexico’s borders are felons.

What’s the difference, one wonders?

US dinero would seem to be the short answer.

Whilst the unlovable Fox was invading the US West, America’s other public nemesis, Osama bin Laden, was announcing that Zacharias Moussaoui was not a part of the 9/11 plot after all.

Turns out Moussaoui was telling the truth when he said he was lying…. about being guilty.

That is, if you believe that bin Laden is now telling the truth.

Strange message from OBL.

Why would this master terrorist waste his time and effort just to let the world know Moussaoui was not a part of 9/11?

Perhaps things are slowing down in the terrorism sector? The equivalent of the housing bubble in the murder and mayhem market?

But which of these two evil doers-Vicente Fox or Osama bin Laden- is a greater threat to America?

Everyone knows that bin Laden orchestrated the 9/11 attacks which killed 3,000 innocent Americans.

How many innocent Americans have been raped, murdered or robbed by illegal aliens since 9/11?

A wicked academic guess: More than 3,000.

Everyone knows that Al-Quadea and Osama bin Laden are an enormous danger to US homeland security, and would kill millions of innocent Americans if given the opportunity.

But how many dedicated terrorists have made it across the US-Mexico border because of the unmanageable flood of mostly-Mexican invaders coming here, for whatever purpose?

Everyone knows that fighting Osama bin Laden and the war on terror is costing America at least $10 billion dollars a month.

But what about the $100 billion it costs each year to provide 20 million illegal aliens with food, education, medical care and other public services?

Everyone knows Osama bin Laden and Islamic extremists are intent on destroying western civilization and converting the entire world to Islam.

But what about the fact that many illegal aliens come to the US with visions of reconquering the American Southwest upper-most in their minds?

Or that millions refuse to assimilate by learning American language and culture?

There is one factor that makes Vicente Fox decidedly more dangerous than Osama bin Laden:

Fox is able to rely on George W Bush as a co-conspirator in the Mexicanization of America.

As far as we know, Osama bin Laden has no such ’special’ relationship with Bush.

The bottom line: How do you say jihad in Spanish?

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, 'clean and sober' since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Whither Bush Concern for Americans and the US Constitution?

2006-07-30T11:31:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Why Does Bush Refuse to Enforce the Law? Why is he Concerned About Offending Illegal Aliens?

As illegal aliens continue to invade America across our unsecured southern border, GW Bush, America's alleged war-on-terror chief, is said to be unwilling to take a hard-line approach to stop the invasion.

The president's refusal is said to be based on 'concern' about offending illegal aliens.

Concern about offending illegal aliens? What in the hell is this naive president smoking?

How about some good old -fashioned presidential concern for American citizens, Mr. President?

You know:

-Concern that a terrorist will cross our border and annihilate thousands or millions of Americans?

-Concern that illegal aliens cost US Taxpayers upwards of $100 billion a year in public services?

-Concern that the standard of living for working-class American citizens is in serious decline, aggravated by millions of illegal aliens who work for less money and without benefits?

-Concern that America is in jeopardy of becoming a third-world abyss, akin to Mexico?

Despite all of the double-talk and nonsense about the need for 'Comprehensive Reform' from Bush, nearly all Democrats and RINOs, the brutal truth is as follows: America needs absolutely no new law or laws.

What we desperately need is a president who understands that:

-His oath of office requires him to defend and protect the people of the United States.

-It is his constitutional duty to keep foreign invaders from crossing US borders and violating US sovereignty.

-Enforcing federal law is NOT a pick-and-choose option. As chief executive of the US, he is REQUIRED to enforce ALL laws.

Federal law, including the Immigration Reform and Control Act (Simpson-Mazzoli Act) of 1986, requires the government to take action against employers who hire illegal aliens.

In addition:

Deportation of illegal aliens is mandated by law.

The US-Mexico border is established in international law.

People who enter America illegally are CRIMINALS who threaten our homeland security, and economic and cultural stability.

All it would take is a presidential order to Homeland Security and the Justice Department ordering those agencies to enforce ALL applicable immigration laws immediately.

But for some strange reason, GW Bush does not seem to give a damn about American citizens or his constitutional responsibilities.

For that, GW Bush deserves to be impeached and removed from office!

Floyd Landis and French 'Testosterone Envy'

2006-07-29T17:23:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Poor Floyd Landis.

America's cycling hero has fallen victim to 'Testosterone envy' in a socialist nation where the male hormone is considered inherently bad.

A nation of pansies where testosterone-deficient males waste hours and hours on a mindless 'sport' that often ends with neither side scoring and without a winner.

A nation where head-butting is actually considered masculine.

Given France's wimpy reputation, why should anyone be surprised that testosterone is not in vogue there?

Why Would a Normal Muslim Ever Resist Death?

2006-07-29T07:05:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Think about it.

If a Muslim man has immediate access to 72 voluptuous virgins upon death, why resist?

In fact, one wonders why Musab Zarqawi tried to crawl off his death-stretcher last June in Iraq?

Given the promise of all that free love, why not just lay back, relax and croak?

Perhaps Zarqawi understood that if he was taken alive, dimwit liberals at the ACLU and DNC would demand he receive a full slate of ‘Terrorist Rights,’ including a civilian jury trial, thereby delaying his demise/reward by a decade or two?

So, Zarqawi did what any sane Muslim about to lose out on 20 years of unfettered sex would do: He tried to escape in order to die immediately!

In the end, though, Zarqawi was a beneficiary of superior American technology as that 500 pound buster- bomb blasted the jihadist killer out of this level of consciousness.

Zarqawi’s last words on that bloody stretcher reflected his gratitude when he stole a direct quote from GW Bush:

Bring them on! said the dying jihadist, with a twinkle in his still-horny eye.

One can assume the three weasels who committed suicide have also snaked their way up to Islamic heaven and are reunited with Zarqawi. Those three are most likely in the process of claiming their heavenly rewards as well, all of which makes suicide, martyrdom and just plain death seem sort of appealing.

So, again I ask: With 72 virgins in the offing, why in the hell do Muslims ever resist death?

How Do You Say Hezbollah in Spanish?

2006-07-27T08:45:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

President Bush has announced that MORE coalition(US) troops will be sent to Baghdad to deal with the insurgency. Seems as though violence is threatening the very existence of the fragile government of Iraq.

At the same time, the United Nations and world leaders are considering the use of a peace- keeping force to quell violence in the never-ending war in the Middle East.

Clearly, there is an urgent need for able-bodied young people to serve the interests of peace around the globe. But where can otherwise unoccupied young folk be found to serve?

Turns out, the answer can be found in the world's most prosperous nation.

Indeed, America is home to upwards of 20 million illegal aliens with no legal or moral basis for being here.

Illegal aliens who drain the American economy of $100 billion each year, and who threaten to destroy American culture and language by dragging our nation into a third-world abyss akin to Mexico.

Why not use illegal aliens in America to meet the need for peace-keeping forces in the Middle East?

To wit, herewith a simple solution:

Round up 550,000 illegal aliens and swear them in as non-citizen conscripts of the US infantry. Once enough illegals are trained and deployed to the middle east, bring 100,000 troops home to secure the US-Mexico border.

After 18 consecutive months of honorable service in the middle east, illegal aliens would be flown directly to Mexico City (no stops in US) with fully-executed deportation documents in hand. They would not be eligible to apply for re-entry, for whatever purpose, into the US for fifteen years from the date of separation at the Mexico City airport.

This pragmatic, yet humane, proposal will provide illegals with jobs, food, housing and medical care, until separation.

At the same time, the US will help bring peace to the middle east while securing our own southern border.

A win-win, if you will.

An added benefit will accrue once this cold, hard truth spreads throughout Mexico:

Breaking into America can cause one to be shipped to a hell -hole 8,000 miles from Tijuana, where Spanish is not spoken, where there are no ACLU lawyers or dimwit liberals to make idiotic arguments on an invader's behalf, and where an infantryman, legal or illegal, stands a good chance of being shot!

Do you suppose that message might discourage a few would-be invaders?

What about illegals unfit for military duty?

Well, labor will be needed to erect that 2,000 mile fence at the border............ how sweet it would be to use illegal immigrants as laborers to build a fence to keep their kind out!

The Fog of Liberalism

2006-07-26T12:25:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Liberalism has been called a mental disorder in some quarters. That label appears appropriate when one considers the liberal position on several current issues:

*Rising gasoline prices are devastating to working-class Americans, but protecting obscure organisms at the bottom of the food chain is of greater concern. Which is why drilling for oil & adding refining capacity are unacceptable.

*Large profits are obscenely un-American, except when it comes to George Soros, Oprah Winfrey and other liberals.

*Driving without a license is illegal; thus,illegal aliens should be licensed to avoid breaking the law.

*The earning power of the average American family is in serious decline, but the US should grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens who will work for lower wages and no benefits, driving wages into further decline.

*Killing the sale of port security to UAE was necessary to protect home land security, but closing the borders with Mexico would unfairly “scapegoat” Hispanics.

*Bilingualism is essential in a tolerant, diverse society, except when it comes to requiring Hispanics to speak English. In that case, it becomes racism.

*Conservatives who work to preserve American culture and tradition are hate mongers. But immigrants from other nations/cultures must be allowed to retain their ‘cultural identity’ at all costs.

*Execution of a convicted killer is cruel, unusual & barbaric; whereas a woman’s right to abort the life of an innocent child is inalienable.

*Starving an innocent, helpless victim like Terri Schaivo to death is fine, whereas using lethal injection to end the life of a brutal killer is not OK.

* Invading a foreign nation is wrong, except when illegal immigrants from Mexico and other Latin nations invade America.

* Discrimination based on race or gender is wrong. Except when waged against Caucasian men, in which case it is mandated by law & called Affirmative Action.

*Masculinity & all things male are the source of all evil, whereas feminism is liberating & spiritual in nature. Jesus was probably female, truth be known.

*Freedom of speech must never be repressed, except when “hurtful” to any constituency of the Democrat party.

*Tax cuts are wrong if it means returning money to the people who actually paid taxes, but perfectly fine when sent to those who paid no taxes.

*Christmas, the Holy Bible & other symbols of Christianity must be quashed so as to offend no one; whereas, Ramadan, the Koran & symbols of Islam must be heavily promoted in the name of religious tolerance.

*Businesses are oppressive, fascist institutions that must not be allowed to grow too large. On the other hand, big government, when run by Democrats, creates wealth & happiness & must be expanded.

*Military force must never be used, except when absolutely needed to advance interests not vital to the US, or to obscure a Democrat president’s sexual misconduct in the Oval Office.

Can there be any doubt that the fog of liberalism is indeed a mental disorder?

Illegal Aliens Demanding Citizenship Is Akin to...

2006-07-26T02:36:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Watching millions of illegal aliens march through the streets of America last month DEMANDING citizenship and full rights was truly mind-boggling.

Just how outrageous are the demands of illegal aliens? Consider some parallel thinking:

-A bank robber DEMANDS interest on the $100,000 taken at gun point during his 'undocumented withdrawal'

-A convicted murderer DEMANDS a share of the proceeds from his victim's life insurance payoff

-A castrated pedophile inmate DEMANDS a tax write-off for his 'Organ Donation'

-A Muslim cleric DEMANDS the WTC 9/11 memorial include references to Allah, the Quaran, and the 'Religion of Peace'

-Just before undergoing a partial-birth abortion, a liberal mother DEMANDS that a Catholic priest conduct a 'last rites' ceremony for the soon-to-be pulverized fetus

Still, illegal aliens appear to have solid allies with just about all Democrats and the liberal media.

But I already mentioned psychotics, didn't I?

Should President Bush Retire or Resign?

2006-07-24T08:10:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

"If you had a European prime minister who experienced what we've experienced it would be expected that he would retire or resign."

What irresponsible, whacked-out liberal said that about our president and commander-in-chief?

Nancy Pelosi? Cindy Sheehan? Howard Dean?

Actually, that is a direct quote from the Father of the modern conservative movement. None other than William F. Buckley, himself.

See story

There he was with those New England eyebrows jumping damn near off his head. Caustic tongue darting in and out of his puckered mouth like a cobra in heat.

As usual, Buckley used long, complex words not spoken in decades. In some cases, never before, at least not on CBS.

And this icon of right-wing thinking took GW Bush to the shed and gave the president a frightful good whipping.

Ten lashes to the president's bum for presiding over out-of-control spending. Deserved!

But Buckley's belt was stretched to the limit in meting out punishment for Bush's greatest failure: Foreign policy.

Specifically, Iraq.

Asked what President Bush's foreign policy legacy will be to his successor, Buckley says "There will be no legacy for Mr. Bush. I don't believe his successor would re-enunciate the words he used in his second inaugural address because they were too ambitious. So therefore I think his legacy is indecipherable"

Indecipherable?

Seems a quite precise description of the Bush agenda concerning illegal immigration as well.

Buckley even went so far as to suggest that George Bush is not a true conservative.

Buckley may be 81, but in my view he is right on the money. GW Bush is no conservative.

An Inconvenient Question: Could Al Gore be RIGHT?

2006-07-23T14:00:00.000-07:00

Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP

Perish the very thought, right?

After all, Al Gore knows as much about science as Bill Clinton does about morality and sexual discretion.

Yet, there are some disturbing signs.

For example, as a resident of the San Francisco Bay area, I am accustomed to suffering through five or six really hot days each summer.

Five or six days total.... all summer.

And even on those few scorchers, once the sun sets, temperatures drop rapidly. Not uncommon to fall asleep under a roaring fan, only to awaken in the middle of the night in search of a light blanket to take the chill off.

2006 is different.

We have already been through more than a week of hot, humid weather. And it does not cool off at night.

Our natural ‘air conditioning’----that famous San Francisco fog---is missing.

Which would be OK if the heat zapped only liberals.

Unfortunately, conservatives suffer as much as liberals. Perhaps more, because we have to endure snide remarks about how Gore was right about global warming after all.

Still, I am not ready to concede the point.

Instead, I propose that all liberals give up their cars, cut their lawns with hand-push mowers, and forsake those noxious summer BBQs.

Lets try that for five to ten years and see if it helps cool things off a bit.

If it does, a tip of the hat would be owed Gore and his liberal minions.

If not, at least we will have reduced traffic and the demand for gasoline, and kept goofy liberals off the roads for a while.

And that would be a good thing!

Wake up and Smell the Kofi!

2006-07-21T13:57:00.000-07:00

Authored by John W Lillpop

In any global crisis, large or small, the United Nations can be counted on to either exacerbate the problem or to have no impact.

Rarely, if ever, does involvement by Secretary General Kofi Anan accomplish much of anything.

Excepting the 'Oil for Food' scandal when Anan and a male offspring proved quite adept at fraud, thievery and cover-up.

So when it comes to a very dangerous world situation, like the current war between Israel and Hezbollah, why should anyone be surprised at, or disappointed by, Anan's performance on July 20?

True to form, Anan blathered on and on in a feeble attempt to assert UN authority and influence. His 'tough talk' included a stern scolding of both sides, and a demand that 'Hostilities must stop.'

Transcript of Anan's 7/20 address

And what was the immediate impact of this 'powerful' leader's words?

More bombings, rocket attacks and plans for a major invasion by Israeli ground forces.

In other words, neither Israel nor Hezbolah paid much attention, except to escalate the violence.

Some leader, some 'Peace Keeping!'

Face it, the UN could not mediate a pie-eating contest at a convention of Southern Baptists. Given the opportunity, Anan would engineer a "Pies for Salvation" scheme, or other such scandal, thereby catipulting the Baptists into an uncivil Holy War for the next 100 years.

Even so, Anan is reportedly sending a 'Team' to the region next week. Would that be volleyball or soccer, Mr. Anan?

And do you have the balls needed, sir?

Still, there is one bit of good news to celebrate: Katie Couric, who takes over as news CBS anchor in September, has announced she will NOT be going to the Middle East to cover the war.

"I think the situation there is so dangerous, and as a single parent with two children, that's something I won't be doing," Katie said.

Perhaps the 'perky' Couric heard about Anan's plans and decided to stay out of the way?

If so, a tip of the hat to the bumbling Anan for finally making a difference----even if it was entirely by accident!

Barry Bonds Bypasses Bail Bonds--For the Moment

2006-07-21T08:31:00.000-07:00

Authored by John W Lillpop

US Attorney Kevin V. Ryan announced on Thursday that Barry Bonds would not be indicted that day.

However, Ryan also stated 'We're not finished yet,' in an ominous warning that no doubt has the Giants' slugger pacing the floors of his mansion.

Although given Bonds' extraordinary wealth, one can safely assume hired staff does his pacing for him.

This legal limbo that has entangled Bonds sets up the following scenario:

Spring, 2012. Five years have passed since Commissioner Bud Selig ended the career of Barry Bonds after the slugger was indicted for perjury and tax evasion.

This is the first year in which Bonds is eligible for induction into the baseball Hall of Fame.

Sportswriters are debating whether or not Bonds' conviction on those federal charges should prevent him from entering baseball's highly coveted museum of greatness.

Bonds'single-season and career home run records have been asterisked by Commissioner Selig, but admission to the Hall of Fame has been left in the hands of sports writers.

Meanwhile, in Leavenworth, Kansas, The Prison Dawg's clean-up hitter and single-term home run leader, sits anxiously beside his cell phone, in Cell 25.

Barry Bonds, Prisoner Number *****, hopes his reputation as a media-friendly, warm and congenial superstar will carry him over the top, and into Cooperstown on the first ballot.

Bonds grows edgy as that 'Big Call from The Hall' does not come through.

At days end, Bonds must confront the brutal truth: He will NOT be in the Hall of Fame, at least not this year. His only hope is to wish for better luck next year.

Meanwhile, he will just have to sit on his asterisk for another year in federal prison.

Does GW Just Rub Some People the Wrong Way?

2006-07-20T07:23:00.000-07:00

Authored by John W Lillpop

Have the liberal media gone barking mad?

One would think so after reading some of the liberal pap about GW Bush's innocent rub administered to German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Like the story published in the San Francisco Chronicle (Bush Gropes, Planet Cringes)in its July 19 edition.

Bush gropes? Planet cringes?

Good heavens, the president was simply comforting an American ally with a little conservative compassion.

Cowboy diplomacy, not erotic arousal, was obviously Mr. Bush's intent.

But to some media, Bush's gentle touch bordered on sexual assault, worthy of a bill of impeachment or, at the very least, induction into the Executive Wing of Nancy Pelosi's Culture of Corruption.

These are the same media types that gave Bill Clinton a free pass when Slick essentially turned the White House into his personal harem, and committed perjury about having "....sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinski."

Where was the liberal outrage when Juanita Broderick, Paula Jones, and Kathleen Wiley accused Clinton of' unwelcome advances, some bordering on criminal behavior?

But once again, there IS a wholly unfair double standard the media applies when reporting or opining about Republicans and Democrats.

To say that W simply 'rubs some people the wrong way' is to deny the intensity of the Bush hatred among liberal media.

Homeless or Illegal, Need Free Health Care? Welcome To San Francisco!

2006-07-19T03:19:00.000-07:00

JOHN W LILLPOP

In a stunning victory for those who champion abandonment of personal responsibility, more government at all costs, and fiscal folly, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to provide all City residents with free health care.

Mind you, The City is already a favored destination for thousands of homeless street people. Logically speaking, increasing the number of uncouth folk who immodestly urinate in public seems an odd way for a 'world class' city to behave.

But, remember, this is San Francisco, the City That Knows How.

Or, used to.

In other encouraging news, the Supervisors apparently discovered a heretofore undisclosed shortfall of illegal aliens.

Because San Francisco's unwritten mission objective is Diversity Before Sanity! , the lack of a robust illegal alien constituency was seen as a serious flaw, nearly rising to the level of criminal negligence.

To fix this racism-based oversight, the new health care benefit will apply to ALL residents, without regard to immigration status.

How will all this be paid for?

Well, this IS liberal paradise, where the T word---taxes--- is king, or queen, to be more precise.

Employers and those with the unmitigated gall to earn a decent wage will be coughing up extra dollars to fund this latest surrender to socialsim.

But according to local media, everyone should celebrate a great day of accomplishment by The City's Best and Brightest.

And why not?

After all, in just a few short hours, these liberal fog-heads have done their utmost to drive away those institutions and individuals that provide jobs, make The City work and pay taxes.

To offset the loss of productive contributors, the Supervisors have issued a warm welcome to those dependent on public handouts, and who pay no taxes.

Longtime local columnist Herb Cain, now deceased, once called San Francisco "Baghdad by the Bay."

To be brutally honest, in July 2006, even Baghdad seems more sane than The City.

Old Gray Lady Editor Still Clueless

2006-07-18T20:12:00.000-07:00

Written By JOHN W LILLPOP

New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller announced plans to reduce the physical dimension of the Old Gray Lady and to cut jobs in order to reduce costs.

Can you believe it? Keller actually believes its the size of his paper, rather than its liberal stench, that is driving readers away.

Unfortunately, the Old Gray Lady is no longer even capable of recognizing 'news fit to print,' much less actually finding and reporting it objectively.

Keller would be well advised to leave the dimensions of the paper alone in favor of the following:

-End the paper's tawdry affair with the Democrat party and liberalism;

-Discontinue the practice of disclosing sensitive information with the potential to provide aid and comfort to those who have declared war on America, and

-Require all NYT employees to attend 'Diversity' workshops for badly-needed attitude adjustments with respect to the US military, Republicans, Christians, Caucasians, heterosexuals, the Bush family tree, law enforcement authorities, US business interests, homeland security, American citizens, patriotism, lower taxes, Old Glory and rule of law.

One last thing, Mr. Keller: Make the correction of NYT errors more complete, prominent and visible on the front page.

That last item, done properly, will probably require that the paper size be doubled, rather than reduced!

Rebirth of Cowboy Diplomacy: Bush Drops an S Bomb!

2006-07-17T13:03:00.000-07:00

WRITTEN BY JOHN W LILLPOP

To hear the Mean- Spirited Media(MSM) tell it, President Bush is guilty of an unforgivable breach of international etiquette and, most likely, the Geneva Convention.

And what is W's latest war crime?

Unwittingly speaking into a live microphone, Bush said this to Tony Blair:

"Syria should should press Hezbollah to stop doing this s***."

Not particularly diplomatic, to be sure.

But Bush's 'colorful' language pales in compassion to the 'F' bombs John Kerry dropped during interviews with print media before the 2004 election.

Of course, Kerry's salty language was calculated to soften his image as an intellectual elitist disconnected from mundane matters tormenting the middle and lower classes.

Thus, an occasional F bomb here and there was seen as a perfectly acceptable means for Kerry to connect with average Americans..... whom Kerry and the liberal MSM jointly regarded as unwashed dunces who swigged untoward quantities of beer, and used the F word whenever a 'cool' verb, adjective, adverb, or noun was needed to complete a lucid thought.

Or when a very short, but passionate, sentence was needed. As in Oh, F!

But GW Bush is NOT John F****** Kerry, and the rules ARE different for Republicans.

Still, Bush can profit from this innocent faux pas: He can do so by spinning the S Crisis as an in your face rejection of Time Magazine's premature burial of Cowboy Diplomacy.

Call it the Rebirth of Cowboy Diplomacy and American hegemony!

SF Bay Area: Home to the Liberally Insane?

2006-07-16T17:55:00.000-07:00

BY JOHN W LILLPOP

In the interest of debunking numerous myths and exaggerations concerning liberalism in the San Francisco Bay Area, it is essential to disclose certain facts:

-It is NOT unlawful to vote Republican in San Francisco;

-A special permit is NOT required to fly the American flag, except on Cinco de Mayo day;

-Speaking English is NOT a hate crime, except at fast-food restaurants, car washes and when speaking to those obviously here illegally;

-Flag-burning is NOT taught at state universities by convicted arsons and volunteer pyromaniacs;

-Bay Area newspapers are NOT edited & published in Moscow;

-Law enforcement job applicants are NOT required to prove they are transvestite, gay, handicapped or a racial minority in order to qualify;

-The minimum wage is NOT $25.00 per hour (plus benefits), and is NOT an inviolate human right;

-Refusing to smoke marijuana when asked to by a police officer is NOT a felony;

-Working at Wal-Mart is NOT against state law, provided one can prove one is an illegal alien;

-Attending the church of one's choice on a regular basis does NOT automatically subject one to higher property taxes;

-Abortions are NOT available on The City's cable cars, but may be arranged through room service at most major hotels, and at progressive piano bars;

-Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer are NOT co-chairs of the San Francisco Mensa society;

-Exhaling second-hand smoke is NOT a special circumstance crime that makes one eligible for the death penalty if convicted;

-English-speaking seniors born and raised in the Bay Area are NOT required to demonstrate Spanish proficiency in order to qualify for social security;

-Displaying the logo of the US Army, Navy, Air Force or Marines does NOT violate city or county ordinances, and is NOT necessarily an arrestable offense;

-Arabic-speaking terrorists are NOT a protected minority;

-Being a straight, white, employed, Christian male does NOT require one to notify the police before moving into a new neighborhood, and

-Seeing Al Gore's 'An Inconvenient Truth' is NOT mandatory as long as one has concrete plans to leave America permanently within the next 90 days.

So while liberalism IS a severe and debilitating mental disorder afflicting millions of Bay Area residents, the good news is that an effective antidote, in the form of conservative values and common sense thinking, is in place and prospering!

Quite a Flaming Babe, that Valerie Plame!

2006-07-16T17:48:00.000-07:00

WRITTEN BY JOHN W LILLPOP

In the case involving Valerie Plame, it remains unclear whether or not she was a covert spy for the CIA. It is equally uncertain whether or not her identity was unlawfully leaked.

However, one thing is absolutely clear and without the slightest doubt: Valerie Plame is drop-dead beautiful!

A Plame by any other name is still a flaming babe!

Ms. Plame's stunning looks catch one off guard, and can cause a temporary loss of focused concentration.

She is also capable of inspiring impromptu fantasies having absolutely nothing to do with boring CIA affairs, but plenty to do with affairs of the heart and all that implies.

Ms. Plame's striking beauty raises immediate questions:

-How in the world did a low-level hack like Joe Wilson attract this icon of female beauty?

-Why did Wilson leave Valerie's side to travel to Niger looking for yellow cake, when he was blessed with a gold mine at home?

-How did Wilson keep Bill Clinton away this Angel of loveliness?

Personally, I hope Plame's suit against Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Scooter Libby et al makes it to court.

A couple of months of Plame on Court TV would be great for their ratings, and a real boost to my fantasy life!

Death, Taxes.........and Taxes After Death in California?

2006-07-13T14:31:00.000-07:00

WRITTEN BY JOHN W LILLPOP

Just how nutty are California Democrats?

Well, consider this.

Democrats are working on a new tax, euphemistically called Property Use Revenue Enhancement(PURE), that will enable the state to pick the pockets of the deceased years after the dearly departed has drawn his/her last breath.

Should Democrats succeed in this dastardly evil, one will no longer be able to escape the greedy clutches of the tax collector by simply dying.

Specifically, Democrats would like to levy a PURE on occupied burial plots at public cemeteries in the state.

The 'logic' behind this latest liberal goofiness is that burial plots are not the 'best and highest use' of California real estate, particularly in light of the skyrocketing escalation of land value. Some land in prime locations has increased by more than 1000% over the past five years.

'Best and highest' use of public land is mandated by California law.

But rather than seizing cemetery property with eminent domain authority, Democrats would prefer to levy a PURE on the descendants of those resting in public burial plots.

Democrat political wonks argue believe that a PURE, if not excessive, would cause far less outrage than an eminent domain action which would involve condemnation of public cemeteries, and require relatives to relocate the remains of loved ones.

Supporters also point out that the PURE would be progressive in nature, meaning that tax collectors would work with state and federal tax authorities to determine current income levels.

Tax rates would then be established based on an 'ability to pay' scale and the number of deceased resting in any specific burial location.

This proposal is being touted in some Democrat circles as the long-awaited salvation for tax and spend liberals everywhere, especially since the PURE could be manipulated to exclude most constituents in the Democrat base.

Republicans are not so sure.

Some even suspect this is a 'trial balloon' being lofted by Democrat gubernatorial candidate Phil Angelides who is alleged to hold stock in the Neptune Society, a service that utilizes cremation, rather than burial, for disposal of human remains.

A PURE on burial plots might cause a run on cremation services, thereby benefiting Anglides, GOP sources suggested.

satireismine

Should US Cede Oklahoma To Mexico?

2006-07-13T06:13:00.000-07:00

By JOHN W LILLPOP

Ending the US-Mexico War

Despite the fact that politicians in America and Mexico will not admit it, the two North American neighbor nations are engaged in war.

Mexico is the aggressor as it continues to attack the US by sending millions of illiterate Mexican peasants across the border into US territory.

This invasion has a devastating impact on US homeland security, economic stability and the preservation of superior Anglican culture and language.

Conversely, applying the theory of 'addition by subtraction,' Mexico is actually strengthened when its more needy and less productive unwashed masses migrate illegally to America.

Because of complex eco-political realities(bribes and fraud), much of America's elected elite has been unwilling to acknowledge the war and to take steps to protect American interests.

Even our Republican president has been co-opted by sinister forces, and has little or no interest in asserting American sovereignty and independence.

Mr. Bush even dismisses the hot bottom topic of 'terrorism' in deference to accommodating an uninterrupted supply of cheap, docile labor from Mexico.

What is the solution, then, to ending this undeclared war, before it spills over into actual violence?

One solution might be to essentially grant-deed one of the 50 US States to Mexico, and designate that state as the 'Illegal Alien" state for Hispanic invaders.

The new state would officially be a part of Mexico, thereby partially assuaging Aztlan activists dedicated to the "Reconquesta" of the American south west.

But which state should the US sacrifice in order to make peace with Mexico?

Clearly the state so designated should be as much like Mexico as possible in order to fashion a seamless transition. Using that criteria, officials would be looking for a US state with the following characteristics:

-History of very poor educational & academic achievements

-High incidence of illiteracy, grade school drop outs

-Very limited opportunities for higher education

-Economy based on low technology, agriculture

-Massive poverty: Average income less than $5,000 per household

-Poor social integration--Racial, economic unrest

-Little or no cultural sophistication

Using these benchmarks, the state of Oklahoma would appear a perfect match for designation as the 'Illegal Alien' state.

Moving 20 million illegal aliens into Oklahoma would have other benefits: The media IQ and literacy scores for Oklahoma would immediately rise, inspiring new and creative sources of capital for social and economic development.

The only remaining significant issue: How do you say Okie in Spanish?

satireismine

Why Vicente Fox Will NOT Burn in Hell

2006-07-11T15:28:00.000-07:00

Written by JOHN W LILLPOP

While many good people of faith are eagerly awaiting Vicente Fox's date with hell and the ensuing charcoaling of his evil being for ever and ever, there is bad news to relate.

Vicente Fox will NOT burn in hell.

Why, you ask?

Where is there justice if the criminal Fox, who has dumped 20 million illiterate peasants on the backs of US taxpayers, is not forced to pay the ultimate price for his crimes?

The answer can be found at Wikepedia.

Look under HELL, and you will see an exhaustive definition of the various sins that will cause eternal damnation, as well as the awful punishments to be meted out to those who live in sin.

On Page 7 of the document, however, there is a list of elements that will not burn, and hence can not be punished with eternal hell.

Among the elements so identified is the product that constitutes 99.999999% of Vicente Fox's personage: Dung!

It is with heavy hearts, indeed, that we the faithful must accept the fact that Vicente Fox will not burn in hell.

That is, unless the devil can invent a way to incinerate dumb dung!

Illegal Aliens in California Prisons: An Inconvenient Truth?

2006-07-10T10:28:00.000-07:00

JOHN W LILLPOP

California's prison system is in absolute crisis.

The inmate population is 200% the number of inmates the state's 33 facilities were designed to accommodate. Health and safety are major concerns.

In a July 9 opinion piece titled A morass behind our prison walls, the editorial staff at the San Jose Mercury News attempted to address the prison crisis.

Although illegal aliens make up a large percentage of the California inmate population and cost taxpayers about $1.6 billion dollars per year, the Mercury News did not even mention this fact. Not a single word about illegal aliens and their impact!

An inconvenient truth, perhaps?

Why did A morass behind our prison walls not call for deporting illegal alien inmates and billing the countries of origin---primarily Mexico--- for the cost of incarceration?

Why no call for greater security at the borders to keep criminals from invading the US to begin with?

Why no call for rounding up and deporting ALL illegal aliens who, by definition, are criminals?

Why not an honest, unbiased look at a major problem afflicting our great nation and state?

Why more of the same old tired editorial malfeasance from the liberal-biased Mercury News?

America Continues To Pay Steep Price for Electing Democrats

2006-07-05T06:43:00.000-07:00

Democrat Presidents Carter and Clinton Caused Most of Current World Crises

BY JOHN W LILLPOP

While America has generally prospered under the steady hand of GW Bush over the past five plus years, our nation continues to pay a steep price for electing Democrats in 1976 and 1992/1996.

Specifically, America's 2006 Independence Day celebrations were marred by news that North Korea fired six missiles including a long-range one with capability to reach the United States. That missile failed shortly after launch.

North Korea's experimentation with missiles and nuclear weapons is a direct result of wrong-headed policies implemented by the Clinton Administration.

With Secretary of State Madeline Albright running the show whilst Bill Clinton was otherwise engaged with Monica Lewinski and others in sex parlors Clinton established in the White House, fatal errors in judgment occurred in the name of official American foreign policy.

In effect, the Clinton Administration aided and abetted in the creation of the North Korean nuclear nightmare, under madman monster leader Kim Jong Il.

Had American military professionals been involved instead of an inexperienced, naive old woman and a president addicted to immoral sexual behavior, Mr. Kim Jong Il would have been put out of business years ago.

In addition to the North Korean mess, GW Bush is dealing with the Iranian nuclear crisis, one that threatens world peace and economic stability in very dangerous ways.

That calamity has its roots in the administration of Jimmy Carter.

Mr. Carter, people will reluctantly remember, is the Democrat president who concerned himself with trivial issues such as scheduling the White House tennis courts.

While President Carter was thus engaged, militant extremists attacked the American embassay in Tehran, taking 62 American citizens as hostages. 52 of those Americans were held captive for more than one year.

Carter's incompetence and bungling is still haunting the US., even though America quickly decided that electing Carter was a huge mistake.

Mr. Carter was sent packing after four miserable, wasted years in office with interest rates hovering above 20% and the prestige of America in ruins.

The bottom line: If America had not elected Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, the world, and especially America, would be far safer today.

America's Heritage: Founded, Perfected by Angry White Men

2006-07-04T13:46:00.000-07:00

Although the disease of liberalism motivates the weak-minded to tear down white Christian men at every opportunity, unrevised American history is actually quite kind to this demographic.

For it was a courageous band of angry white men, mostly Christian, who offered all of mankind a glimmer of hope in the ongoing battle against oppression and tyranny.

On July 4, 1776, the independence of our blessed nation was established. The liberating Declaration of Independence was created without the diversity and multi-culturalism that modern liberals claim is our 'greatest strength.'

Despite this astounding lack of diversity, these angry white men created a formula for self-governance and freedom that has made America the envy of all the world.

This is not to say that diversity is harmful or not beneficial to America.

But it is to say that those who strive to discredit our founding fathers need to drop the anti-white Christian rhetoric.

That demographic has produced and perfected the most successful and prosperous society in human history.

They deserve the respect and undying gratitude of all Americans!

Illegal Aliens: Courageous Heroes or Yellow Cowards?

2006-07-04T10:48:00.000-07:00

BY JOHN W LILLPOP

Of all the ridiculous spin lines in the illegal alien debate, the one guaranteed to drive my last meal out is the one that celebrates criminal invaders as: "Courageous heroes who risked death by crossing a hostile desert just to improve their lives."

Heroes?

Only an idiot like Mexican president Vicente Fox would seek to glorify criminals for violating US borders and laws.

Although one must concede that from Fox's perspective, illegal aliens ARE heroes.... because when tens of millions of Mexican peasants invade America, they are out of his hair..... and dumped squarely on the backs of US taxpayers.

But heroes?

Recent events suggest that these criminals are not so courageous, after all.

Indeed, when it came time to vote in Mexico's election, most illegal aliens avoided going home, fearful of being unable to re-invade the US.

All that brown macho apparently morphed into chicken yellow.

Let's hope that that chicken yellow prevents illegals from voting in our elections this Fall.

Lord knows there will be plenty of corrupt Democrats urging them to do so!

Old Gray Lady Does Not Look So Hot in Red

2006-07-04T10:15:00.000-07:00

BY JOHN W LILLPOP

'All the news that's fit to print,' has long been the slogan of the New York Times, once a proud, respected news source relied on by people all over the globe.

Regrettably, liberalism has infected the brains of some very powerful folks at the paper. Out- of -control liberalism has in turn spawned raw, unrestrained hatred for George Bush, and that has driven the old Gray lady into the gutter.

Indeed, the old Gray lady has taken to the streets like a tramp in the night, one who sells her soul and journalistic integrity for the Holy Grail of the corporate news world ----the scoop.

Like any other despicable tramp, the Lady in Red cares not one whit about those who subscribe to her services.

So what if national security is weakened? How is that my concern, the Lady in Red cries?

After all, her sole responsibility is to inform the public, even if doing so threatens the health and lives of the very people she is obsessed with informing.

If America loses the war on terror because of treasonous behavior by tramps like those at the New York Times, at least we the people can take comfort in the knowledge that we were well informed.

Even Bill Keller can not really believe that that makes one lick of sense.

That Fetus: "An Inconvenient Pregnancy" or "Life Before Birth?"

2006-07-04T10:12:00.000-07:00

BY JOHN W LILLPOP

As Americans struggle to cope with the gut-wrenching issues of the day, one concern constantly dominates the social wars from one generation to the next, unabated in intensity and emotional power.

That issue is America's love-hate relationship with abortion.

Those who favor a woman's right to terminate a human fetus
should consider a thought that captures the spirit of this debate, eloquently and succinctly, all at once:

Life before birth!

That says it all, really. Call that fetus what you wish, but the fact remains it is human life.

Albeit, a life without power, voting rights, free speech or any other protection afforded the born.

But a human life, nonetheless.

A precious gift from God----regardless of how inconvenient the pregnancy may be to the vessel blessed with the greatest gift He can bestow.

Willfully ending a human life is, in essence, a declaration that one is somehow justified in destroying one of our Creator's most spectacular achievements.

A superseding of Divine Will by mortal will, if you will.

And if you supplant Divine Will with your own in order to end a human life, someday you will have to account for your decision before God ---- in a judgment you simply can not afford to lose!

Which is why, even in cases involving the most despicable sub-human killers, our society affords layer-upon-layer of legal review and recourse before implementing death as the officially-sanctioned punishment by the state.

Unfortunately, while liberals fight to the bitter end to save the pathetic life of a thug convicted of multiple murders, there is no mercy or fight in them for the unborn-----those who have life before birth.

And while they work 24/7 to prevent executions of convicted killers because of newly-minted concerns about the 'pain' inflicted by lethal injections, liberal dogma is perfectly OK with the fact that 40 million human lives have been purged, courtesy of the Roe V Wade Fetus Death Certificate, issued in 1973.

40 million! Nearly seven times greater than those who perished in the Holocaust. About the number Joseph Stalin butchered in the USSR.

But the 40 million lives slaughtered by Americans were not political, social or religious enemies of anyone.

They were innocent young human lives waiting for a chance to experience the American Dream----but who were destroyed because each was "An Inconvenient Pregnancy."

May good and righteousness prevail in the hearts of Americans and replace a mindset that tolerates 'An Inconvenient Pregnancy' with one that celebrates "Life before Birth!"

Forget Building Schools In Mexico: Move Hollywood Elite There Instead!

2006-07-04T10:10:00.000-07:00

BY JOHN W LILLPOP

Susan Sarandon, Hollywood's dumbed-down version of Nancy Pelosi, has stunned the civilized world with a proposal so brilliant one wonders why it has not surfaced before: Sarandon wants the United States to build schools in Mexico. At US-taxpayer expense, of course.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/06/22/ap/entertainment/mainD8IDHHLG0.shtml

According to Sarandon, such a move would do more to end illegal immigration than constructing a fence at the US-Mexico border because it would bring Mexican children the gift of education.

Forget the fact that building new schools in Mexico will not stop 'good-hearted, hard-working' people just looking for a better life from invading America. Sarandon's proposal is super-wacky because it would make American taxpayers responsible for fixing problems rightfully belonging to the Mexican people.

Problems that should be addressed by the corrupt, rotten Mexican government.

Until Mexico installs honorable people of integrity into positions of leadership, the US must use whatever means(including military force) necessary to keep people like Vicente Fox from dumping Mexico's problems on the US side of the border.

Misery loves company, but downgrading America into a 3rd-world slum on a par with Mexico will only serve to make liberals like Sarandon feel better. It most certainly will not fix the problem.

But perhaps there is another solution that would ease liberal guilt without costing US taxpayer hundreds of billions.

Namely: Move Hollywood ---the motion picture industry, the elitist stars, the anti-America crowd-- the whole enchilada to Mexico, en masse.

What a boon it would be to the Mexican economy to have all those rich, famous liberals in their very midst. A billion dollar movie industry could be just what the doc ordered for our 3rd-world neighbor.

And if it turns out that the 'trickle down' effect from the Hollywood-Mex venture does not quite boost the economy enough, Mexico's government could always tax the living hell out of Hollywood's brightest stars, and seize the huge mansions such stars would surely buy or build once in Mexico.

Compassionate liberals like Sarandon, obsessed with ending Mexican poverty, would surely be willing to give whatever part of their personal fortunes might be needed to achieve such a noble cause.

For the 'little' people of Mexico.

And if the redistribution of Hollywood wealth still fails to seal the deal, Father Mahoney and others of like mind in the Catholic clergy might be persuaded to join forces with the Hollywood elite by moving to Mexico as well.

After all, Father Mahoney is always looking for an opportunity to stamp out poverty.

Moving to Mexico would provide the Father and his ilk with an unlimited and immediate source of people to help---or, more accurately, 'fleece?'

Pelosi 'Speaker Express' Crushes Willam J. Jefferson

2006-07-04T10:08:00.000-07:00

"This isn't about proof in a court of law. This is about an ethical standard."

BY JOHN W LILLPOP

Nancy Pelosi(Dunce-California) had this to say about the Democrats' vote to strip William Jefferson of a highly-valued committee assignment:

"This isn't about proof in a court of law. This is about an ethical standard," she told reporters. [url=http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2082852]http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2082852[/url]

Regrettably, not all Democrats agree with this bug-eyed airhead from San Francisco.

58 Democrats voted against the cleansing. Some even saw it as 'ethnic' cleansing.

But hardly any of those 58 ethically-challenged Democrats have ordered drapes, new carpeting and a 'Diversity Hotline' for the Speaker's office as Pelosi has.

To her credit, Pelosi has not yet yanked down Hastert's name- plate from the Speaker's office door. But only because such vandalism would have to be done very late at night, and Pelosi refuses to leave her pet rats alone after dark.

Unless her presence on the Hill is essential to conducting a 21st century 'Hi-Tech' lynching. Eat your heart out, Anita Hill!

After presiding over the Jefferson human sacrifice Thursday evening, the Queen of the Godless from San Francisco added this:

"I wish the White House would follow our lead on this."

A none-too-subtle slam at president Bush for actually keeping his word on Karl Rove.

Rove, for liberals with short, selective, memories, is the White House fellow NOT indicted this week----and never to be, thank you!

But perhaps Pelosi has a here-to-now unseen video of Karl Rove telling a room full of reporters, in no uncertain terms, that Valerie Plame was a CIA agent.

And another video, recorded shortly thereafter, showing Rove lying about that unlawful disclosure to to a room full of FBI agents. Under oath.

If so, Nancy please release that video. For the common good, woman!

If not, Pelosi should finish her 'House Cleaning' by focusing on the likes of Cynthia McKinney, Patrick Kennedy and other Democrats who fail to meet her high ethical standards.

Lots of 'House Work' there, Ms. Speaker-to-be.

That is, if you really care about a Clean House!

Honoring Old Glory on Independence Day!

2006-07-04T10:04:00.000-07:00

BY JOHN W LILLPOP

As American citizens dig into those BBQ steaks, corn on the cob, watermelon and Cherry Cobbler on the 4th, let a clarion call be sounded:

34 United States Senators voted against protecting Old Glory and declared, in effect, that the Red, White and Blue is nothing special.

Thus, the amendment to prevent desecration of our most precious symbol was once again sabotaged by those who simply do not care enough to do the right thing.

Democrats dominated the opposition, as usual, to this common-sense proposal with 30 out of 44(75%) voting to say 'To Hell With Old Glory!'

Lousy Democrats were joined by three RINOs and one independent in dumping Old Glory into the trash heap.

If just one of those 34 politicians had considered the young men and women fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan before casting their wrong minded votes, America would have taken a giant step forward.

Unfortunately, that was not the case.

So, we the people are once again stuck with political malfeasance and neglect at the hands of Democrats and miscellaneous weasels who can not stand to see the United States or any of its institutions honored.

Thank God they were not voting on the July 4th celebration itself, or next Tuesday would have been become just another day....nothing special.

I urge all who love this nation and who cherish American values to join me in saying Hell No! to the 34 weasels.