War on Terror More Lengthy than World War II? Blame Liberalism!
Authored by JOHN W LILLPOP
A reader in the San Francisco Bay area recently had a letter published in the San Jose Mercury News in which he cited some interesting facts about the length of the war on terror as compared to World War 11.
Unfortunately, the reader–obviously a biased liberal, made no attempt to explain why World War II was decided in so much less time.
The fact is that during World War II, both political parties were solidly behind the American troops and the U.S. president. Both parties wanted the United States to win.
There was no John Murtha, Nancy Pelsoi, John Kerry, or Howard Dean doing their best to cripple U.S. war efforts. The U.S. Supreme Court was not working against American interests. Mike Wallace had just barely reached retirement age.
Back then, there was no ACLU working 24/7 to destroy the U.S. military. The New York Times was not leaking highly sensitive information about government surveillance programs.
Most reporters and editors in the mainstream media were American patriots first and reporters trying to sell war news stories second.
The bottom Line is that if the liberalism of 2006 had been around during World War II, America would still be fighting Japan, Germany and Italy.
Or, even worse, living under a Nazi and/or fascist regime.
John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, 'clean and sober' since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, the only place on the planet where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!
A reader in the San Francisco Bay area recently had a letter published in the San Jose Mercury News in which he cited some interesting facts about the length of the war on terror as compared to World War 11.
Unfortunately, the reader–obviously a biased liberal, made no attempt to explain why World War II was decided in so much less time.
The fact is that during World War II, both political parties were solidly behind the American troops and the U.S. president. Both parties wanted the United States to win.
There was no John Murtha, Nancy Pelsoi, John Kerry, or Howard Dean doing their best to cripple U.S. war efforts. The U.S. Supreme Court was not working against American interests. Mike Wallace had just barely reached retirement age.
Back then, there was no ACLU working 24/7 to destroy the U.S. military. The New York Times was not leaking highly sensitive information about government surveillance programs.
Most reporters and editors in the mainstream media were American patriots first and reporters trying to sell war news stories second.
The bottom Line is that if the liberalism of 2006 had been around during World War II, America would still be fighting Japan, Germany and Italy.
Or, even worse, living under a Nazi and/or fascist regime.
John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, 'clean and sober' since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, the only place on the planet where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!
posted by John W Lillpop | 10:07 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home